McLaren分版招工&招商贴

69回复/ 111441 浏览
yukanoeve(54级)楼主2009-04-06 14:14:00发布于上海
McLaren分版招工&招商贴yukanoeve 发表在迈凯伦 https://bbs.hupu.com/mclaren

全部回帖

收起

Q & A with Martin Whitmarsh


 


McLaren's extraordinary Malaysian Grand Prix weekend took another painful twist on Sunday morning when newspaper reports suggested that Lewis Hamilton had threatened to quit the team and Formula 1 over this week's controversy.


 


Shortly after that revelation, team principal Martin Whitmarsh and Mercedes motorsport boss Norbert Haug sat down in front of the media to give their side of everything that has unfolded since the fateful stewards hearing in Melbourne.


 


Q. If you go in to the stewards and you say he wasn't instructed to let Jarno by, and they have radio transmission that they will obviously listen to, how did that situation arise?


 


Martin Whitmarsh: Well I think after the Australian Grand Prix as far as any of us were concerned there was no controversy and therefore I don't think any of us contemplated any issue that was going to arise, we had committed no offence. I think Davey had in my view... in the heat of the moment, I think he felt very guilty. The background is, following what happened in Spa there was a hyper-sensitivity about overtaking under a safety [car period]. When the incident happened, Lewis informed the team that he had overtaken Trulli, as far as we were concerned under a safety. And of course we didn't have the monitors that race control had, and the reflex action from Davey was to make the call to tell the people speaking to Lewis to let Trulli through.


 


Now that was wrong and it was unnecessary and I think Davey as many people know him is a person of huge commitment, wants to do things right, and he made an error. The error in itself was not significant and we spoke to the FIA under the period of the safety car, asked them if we could reverse the position, and told them what had happened. Understandably race control were busy and said 'look we will have to deal with this after the race'.


 


I think Davey carried some guilt because he had made a mistake and was very hard on himself and I think in the heat of the moment with the stewards, unnecessarily caused Lewis, and led Lewis, to mislead the stewards and one event fell into another. I think it was very difficult for Davey, because I think he had that guilt, and this is a guy who after 35 years of fantastic service and an impeccable record, made a big error. And it was in that heat of the moment, but you know, I don't categorically know that. It is just what I believe happened and what led to it.


 


Q. Is there anything different about the radio procedures that the FIA has this year that made you think that they might not have listened to it?


 


MW: No no, I mean the FIA has had access to the radios for a number of years, so they listen and there was a conversation with Charlie. So I think everyone realised that, or believed, that Charlie was listening. It was a very sensitive part of the race. Again in reality no offence had been committed, the information was openly available to the FIA and that's what makes the circumstances that unfolded fairly extraordinary.


 


Q. Can you explain how Lewis could be having conversations with the FIA about quitting the team and Formula 1 and yet you and Lewis had no conversation about this in four days. Lewis was thinking about leaving and you knew nothing about it, and also presumably Ron knew nothing about it, or did he?


 


MW: I had spoken to Max on Friday, I know that Anthony had spoken to Max, and spoken to other FIA officials. First I knew of what you just said was this morning. We have asked Anthony only five minutes ago if this is true and Anthony has told us that Lewis has not spoken to Max.


 


Q. Did Anthony say that he had spoken to Max?


 


MW: I knew that on Friday morning both I and Anthony spoke to Max, I also spoke to Charlie Whiting, Alan Donnelly, so I know that but I am told that Lewis has not spoken to Max.


 

Q & A with Martin Whitmarsh


 


McLaren's extraordinary Malaysian Grand Prix weekend took another painful twist on Sunday morning when newspaper reports suggested that Lewis Hamilton had threatened to quit the team and Formula 1 over this week's controversy.


 


Shortly after that revelation, team principal Martin Whitmarsh and Mercedes motorsport boss Norbert Haug sat down in front of the media to give their side of everything that has unfolded since the fateful stewards hearing in Melbourne.


 


Q. If you go in to the stewards and you say he wasn't instructed to let Jarno by, and they have radio transmission that they will obviously listen to, how did that situation arise?


 


Martin Whitmarsh: Well I think after the Australian Grand Prix as far as any of us were concerned there was no controversy and therefore I don't think any of us contemplated any issue that was going to arise, we had committed no offence. I think Davey had in my view... in the heat of the moment, I think he felt very guilty. The background is, following what happened in Spa there was a hyper-sensitivity about overtaking under a safety [car period]. When the incident happened, Lewis informed the team that he had overtaken Trulli, as far as we were concerned under a safety. And of course we didn't have the monitors that race control had, and the reflex action from Davey was to make the call to tell the people speaking to Lewis to let Trulli through.


 


Now that was wrong and it was unnecessary and I think Davey as many people know him is a person of huge commitment, wants to do things right, and he made an error. The error in itself was not significant and we spoke to the FIA under the period of the safety car, asked them if we could reverse the position, and told them what had happened. Understandably race control were busy and said 'look we will have to deal with this after the race'.


 


I think Davey carried some guilt because he had made a mistake and was very hard on himself and I think in the heat of the moment with the stewards, unnecessarily caused Lewis, and led Lewis, to mislead the stewards and one event fell into another. I think it was very difficult for Davey, because I think he had that guilt, and this is a guy who after 35 years of fantastic service and an impeccable record, made a big error. And it was in that heat of the moment, but you know, I don't categorically know that. It is just what I believe happened and what led to it.


 


Q. Is there anything different about the radio procedures that the FIA has this year that made you think that they might not have listened to it?


 


MW: No no, I mean the FIA has had access to the radios for a number of years, so they listen and there was a conversation with Charlie. So I think everyone realised that, or believed, that Charlie was listening. It was a very sensitive part of the race. Again in reality no offence had been committed, the information was openly available to the FIA and that's what makes the circumstances that unfolded fairly extraordinary.


 


Q. Can you explain how Lewis could be having conversations with the FIA about quitting the team and Formula 1 and yet you and Lewis had no conversation about this in four days. Lewis was thinking about leaving and you knew nothing about it, and also presumably Ron knew nothing about it, or did he?


 


MW: I had spoken to Max on Friday, I know that Anthony had spoken to Max, and spoken to other FIA officials. First I knew of what you just said was this morning. We have asked Anthony only five minutes ago if this is true and Anthony has told us that Lewis has not spoken to Max.


 


Q. Did Anthony say that he had spoken to Max?


 


MW: I knew that on Friday morning both I and Anthony spoke to Max, I also spoke to Charlie Whiting, Alan Donnelly, so I know that but I am told that Lewis has not spoken to Max.


 

亮了(0)
回复

Q. My second question is, that on Friday when you advanced the case that no one outside of Dave Ryan or Lewis Hamilton had any idea what case they were going to put to the stewards in Sepang, I think most of us feel that is too incredible to be true. And can you explain how no one would have discussed this with Dave Ryan, especially after the team was notified?


 


MW: The team learned about the stewards hearing I think at about 10.30 in the morning. I think it was informed... I was travelling here at the time and Dave and Lewis attended that hearing. I arrived after that hearing, in the aftermath of it and did anyone else discuss it with Lewis and Dave? No I don't believe there was any discussion. If you are asking did Ron discuss it, I don't believe there was any discussion with Ron either.


 


Dave is a sporting director. He is a senior and trusted member of this organisation so... I happened to be travelling in that period of time, which you know I... one of the criticisms against me is that I was on holiday, that I didn't arrive here in time. And I have got deep regret about that. But clearly as I left Australia on Sunday evening I wasn't aware of an issue. An issue was started to be reported on Wednesday, which I was told about, but frankly I did not believe the scale of it nor the speed of it.


 


I didn't know that the Australian stewards would be here and I hadn't imagined - and again maybe a big misjudgement on my part – but I hadn't imagined that there was going to be a stewards hearing here. I knew that there was an issue developing on Wednesday and that I had to speak to the people directly, which I did. Through to Friday morning Dave still held the view that he had not lied to the stewards, and that process I needed to go through. On Thursday night I left here with the feeling that this was a very severe and significant and embarrassing event for this team. Something which we have apologised for, I have apologised for and I apologise again to the media, to the FIA, to the World Motor Sport Council, to the president for what has happened.


 


On Friday morning I felt I was going to talk to Charlie Whiting and I was going to ask Charlie Whiting what he thought. Did he feel... He was present, he knew what had gone on, he had had radio conversations during the race, listened to the radio. But I came to the view on Friday morning that in fact I didn't need to speak to Charlie.


 


I took a very tough decision, probably the most difficult professional decision of my life, to shatter a life of a very close colleague and friend and a huge part of this team. After which I'd made that decision, there had been suggestions that I was under pressure to do it. There was no pressure from the FIA or anyone else, I took a decision, I then spoke to Charlie, I then rang Max. I spoke to Alan Donnelly about what had happened.


 


As a team we arranged... I knew I was in the FIA press conference as you know and that I [had to] say something there. I had to apologise for the fact that I came here on Thursday, that I was late, when I arrived this event had unfolded. I had a human instinct, which was wrong probably, to defend colleagues, both Dave and Lewis, and in doing that and jumping to that defence, I hadn't done the necessary homework for which I am deeply regretful of. But having spoken to Lewis, and Lewis told me on Thursday evening that he felt he had lied. Dave still did not, but I reflected on it overnight, and had to come to the view that I had to suspend Dave. I told the FIA what had happened and explained it to them, I explained it on Friday.


 


Of course I have got a lot of regrets, I wish I had come straight here. I wish I had anticipated it. But in truth even if I was here on Monday, Tuesday and probably Wednesday, it wouldn't have made any difference because it wasn't an event that was unfolding or that we were aware of. And Lewis wasn't here either, he had gone on his own holiday somewhere. I hadn't spoken to Lewis... since the race I am sure I would have said great job or something to that effect. I left early Sunday evening and went on holiday and Lewis did either on Sunday night or Monday. The story that he then spoke to the FIA was something that I learned this morning and when we checked just a few moments ago we were told it isn't true.


 

Q. My second question is, that on Friday when you advanced the case that no one outside of Dave Ryan or Lewis Hamilton had any idea what case they were going to put to the stewards in Sepang, I think most of us feel that is too incredible to be true. And can you explain how no one would have discussed this with Dave Ryan, especially after the team was notified?


 


MW: The team learned about the stewards hearing I think at about 10.30 in the morning. I think it was informed... I was travelling here at the time and Dave and Lewis attended that hearing. I arrived after that hearing, in the aftermath of it and did anyone else discuss it with Lewis and Dave? No I don't believe there was any discussion. If you are asking did Ron discuss it, I don't believe there was any discussion with Ron either.


 


Dave is a sporting director. He is a senior and trusted member of this organisation so... I happened to be travelling in that period of time, which you know I... one of the criticisms against me is that I was on holiday, that I didn't arrive here in time. And I have got deep regret about that. But clearly as I left Australia on Sunday evening I wasn't aware of an issue. An issue was started to be reported on Wednesday, which I was told about, but frankly I did not believe the scale of it nor the speed of it.


 


I didn't know that the Australian stewards would be here and I hadn't imagined - and again maybe a big misjudgement on my part – but I hadn't imagined that there was going to be a stewards hearing here. I knew that there was an issue developing on Wednesday and that I had to speak to the people directly, which I did. Through to Friday morning Dave still held the view that he had not lied to the stewards, and that process I needed to go through. On Thursday night I left here with the feeling that this was a very severe and significant and embarrassing event for this team. Something which we have apologised for, I have apologised for and I apologise again to the media, to the FIA, to the World Motor Sport Council, to the president for what has happened.


 


On Friday morning I felt I was going to talk to Charlie Whiting and I was going to ask Charlie Whiting what he thought. Did he feel... He was present, he knew what had gone on, he had had radio conversations during the race, listened to the radio. But I came to the view on Friday morning that in fact I didn't need to speak to Charlie.


 


I took a very tough decision, probably the most difficult professional decision of my life, to shatter a life of a very close colleague and friend and a huge part of this team. After which I'd made that decision, there had been suggestions that I was under pressure to do it. There was no pressure from the FIA or anyone else, I took a decision, I then spoke to Charlie, I then rang Max. I spoke to Alan Donnelly about what had happened.


 


As a team we arranged... I knew I was in the FIA press conference as you know and that I [had to] say something there. I had to apologise for the fact that I came here on Thursday, that I was late, when I arrived this event had unfolded. I had a human instinct, which was wrong probably, to defend colleagues, both Dave and Lewis, and in doing that and jumping to that defence, I hadn't done the necessary homework for which I am deeply regretful of. But having spoken to Lewis, and Lewis told me on Thursday evening that he felt he had lied. Dave still did not, but I reflected on it overnight, and had to come to the view that I had to suspend Dave. I told the FIA what had happened and explained it to them, I explained it on Friday.


 


Of course I have got a lot of regrets, I wish I had come straight here. I wish I had anticipated it. But in truth even if I was here on Monday, Tuesday and probably Wednesday, it wouldn't have made any difference because it wasn't an event that was unfolding or that we were aware of. And Lewis wasn't here either, he had gone on his own holiday somewhere. I hadn't spoken to Lewis... since the race I am sure I would have said great job or something to that effect. I left early Sunday evening and went on holiday and Lewis did either on Sunday night or Monday. The story that he then spoke to the FIA was something that I learned this morning and when we checked just a few moments ago we were told it isn't true.


 

亮了(0)
回复

Q. I don't understand how four days later those two guys could go in to a stewards hearing and stick to their story when this was in your own press release on Sunday. And secondly are you 100 per cent convinced that Lewis is an unwilling victim in all this and that he was completely forced to go along with it?


 


MW: I think Lewis has very bravely sat before the media and has confessed his guiltiness. That is not something that Lewis is comfortable with, I'm sure he is embarrassed and deeply regretful and I think he has expressed that. We for our part, have to accept that Lewis is a world champion, he is an ambassador. We have got to lead him and direct him and that duty of care we failed on and that's something that we are deeply apologetic for.


 


I don't think Lewis believes that he is without blame. In fact I know he doesn't believe that but he made a mistake, he's a world champion and he didn't set the standards that he would hold dearly, so he feels very bad about that.


 


I think the press release... we didn't believe that, and I didn't believe, that letting Trulli past was contentious on Sunday night. Again we actually didn't do anything, there was no offence committed. In the heat of... for whatever reason, Dave personally thought he had made a mistake and that influenced his judgement, which was completely unnecessary. And that was the great sadness of this. It was something which didn't need to happen at all.


 


Q. In light of what Lewis's manager said to Max Mosley and the way they feel they have been let down by the team, how do you see Lewis's future here? Have there been talks with his manager? Do you expect them?


 


MW: Well again I have read some stories this morning but I have obviously spoken to Lewis quite a few occasions and Anthony. We are here trying to do a job and go racing and this has been quite a distracting influence, but in all of those conversations the commitment from Anthony and Lewis to this team has not altered.


 


It's been extreme and there has been no hint of what has been reported this morning, so at the moment I don't believe what has been reported.


 


But I think what we do know is as a team we have got to learn from the mistakes that have been made, I have got to learn. I have made mistakes, I said it on Friday I'm saying it here. I have to represent the team, I have to apologise on behalf of the team to you guys, to the public, to the FIA. And I have to apologise on my own behalf because on Thursday I hadn't done my homework, I was ill-prepared and I made some mistakes. Lewis has done the same. It's been a pretty tough time for him, we have been trying to deal with this and allow Lewis to concentrate on doing the best job we can here, we are a racing team trying to go motor racing.


 


So everything that Anthony and Lewis has said to me has been incredibly supportive, appreciative of what this team has done for them and there has been no hint of anything that they've said that would cause me to believe that they would contemplate [leaving] for this or any other reason. Now something different has been reported in the media, but a leading part of that was that he had spoken directly to Max. I don't believe that happened because Anthony told us minutes ago that there was no truth in that story.


 


Q. Have you considered your future, are you considering your future with the team?


 


MW: Well it wouldn't be true if I said I wasn't because at a time like this you think about what you got involved with this sport for and it wasn't for this sort of thing. You also think about what is best for the company and this great team. And it hasn't been a great experience for me. It wasn't what I started out 20 years ago to experience.


 


However the loss of Dave is a huge hole, he was such a pivotal part, he ran this team, let's be frank. There are various people that have been the figureheads but Dave ran this team, he made the operational decisions, he made it happen. And to take him out of this and deal with this weekend, the distraction and the operation in very difficult circumstances, to plan going to the next race as well, and contemplate the future without Dave has been challenging in the extreme.


 


I think I've been very fortunate, there have been some deeply painful moments for me over the course of this weekend, but there have surprisingly been one or two moments when your faith in humanity and this team is restored. Because there are some very kind things that have been said, I have had fantastic support from within the team. And I owe it to not just the people here, there are a thousand people in Brixworth, Woking and Stuttgart and our other partners who concentrate on this programme, and I have got to do what I think is best to stabilise a very difficult situation.


 


In the longer term I can contemplate my own future. Of course it is not self-determining, it's for the shareholders of this team to take a view and that's something they have to decide what's the best thing. There is a representative of the largest shareholder sat alongside me and I think it's ultimately for those people to decide what happens in this team, not me.


 

Q. I don't understand how four days later those two guys could go in to a stewards hearing and stick to their story when this was in your own press release on Sunday. And secondly are you 100 per cent convinced that Lewis is an unwilling victim in all this and that he was completely forced to go along with it?


 


MW: I think Lewis has very bravely sat before the media and has confessed his guiltiness. That is not something that Lewis is comfortable with, I'm sure he is embarrassed and deeply regretful and I think he has expressed that. We for our part, have to accept that Lewis is a world champion, he is an ambassador. We have got to lead him and direct him and that duty of care we failed on and that's something that we are deeply apologetic for.


 


I don't think Lewis believes that he is without blame. In fact I know he doesn't believe that but he made a mistake, he's a world champion and he didn't set the standards that he would hold dearly, so he feels very bad about that.


 


I think the press release... we didn't believe that, and I didn't believe, that letting Trulli past was contentious on Sunday night. Again we actually didn't do anything, there was no offence committed. In the heat of... for whatever reason, Dave personally thought he had made a mistake and that influenced his judgement, which was completely unnecessary. And that was the great sadness of this. It was something which didn't need to happen at all.


 


Q. In light of what Lewis's manager said to Max Mosley and the way they feel they have been let down by the team, how do you see Lewis's future here? Have there been talks with his manager? Do you expect them?


 


MW: Well again I have read some stories this morning but I have obviously spoken to Lewis quite a few occasions and Anthony. We are here trying to do a job and go racing and this has been quite a distracting influence, but in all of those conversations the commitment from Anthony and Lewis to this team has not altered.


 


It's been extreme and there has been no hint of what has been reported this morning, so at the moment I don't believe what has been reported.


 


But I think what we do know is as a team we have got to learn from the mistakes that have been made, I have got to learn. I have made mistakes, I said it on Friday I'm saying it here. I have to represent the team, I have to apologise on behalf of the team to you guys, to the public, to the FIA. And I have to apologise on my own behalf because on Thursday I hadn't done my homework, I was ill-prepared and I made some mistakes. Lewis has done the same. It's been a pretty tough time for him, we have been trying to deal with this and allow Lewis to concentrate on doing the best job we can here, we are a racing team trying to go motor racing.


 


So everything that Anthony and Lewis has said to me has been incredibly supportive, appreciative of what this team has done for them and there has been no hint of anything that they've said that would cause me to believe that they would contemplate [leaving] for this or any other reason. Now something different has been reported in the media, but a leading part of that was that he had spoken directly to Max. I don't believe that happened because Anthony told us minutes ago that there was no truth in that story.


 


Q. Have you considered your future, are you considering your future with the team?


 


MW: Well it wouldn't be true if I said I wasn't because at a time like this you think about what you got involved with this sport for and it wasn't for this sort of thing. You also think about what is best for the company and this great team. And it hasn't been a great experience for me. It wasn't what I started out 20 years ago to experience.


 


However the loss of Dave is a huge hole, he was such a pivotal part, he ran this team, let's be frank. There are various people that have been the figureheads but Dave ran this team, he made the operational decisions, he made it happen. And to take him out of this and deal with this weekend, the distraction and the operation in very difficult circumstances, to plan going to the next race as well, and contemplate the future without Dave has been challenging in the extreme.


 


I think I've been very fortunate, there have been some deeply painful moments for me over the course of this weekend, but there have surprisingly been one or two moments when your faith in humanity and this team is restored. Because there are some very kind things that have been said, I have had fantastic support from within the team. And I owe it to not just the people here, there are a thousand people in Brixworth, Woking and Stuttgart and our other partners who concentrate on this programme, and I have got to do what I think is best to stabilise a very difficult situation.


 


In the longer term I can contemplate my own future. Of course it is not self-determining, it's for the shareholders of this team to take a view and that's something they have to decide what's the best thing. There is a representative of the largest shareholder sat alongside me and I think it's ultimately for those people to decide what happens in this team, not me.


 

亮了(0)
回复

Q. Therefore you will not be resigning, it will be a question of them resigning?


 


MW: I'm not resigning this weekend. We've made a commitment to look at how we arrived in this situation and we've got to learn from it and we've got to do better in future. We will do a better job, I think therefore it is wrong to rule anything out, I've got to look at what is the best way forward for this team and how can we do better in the future.


 


Q. The German nation is waiting for a clear statement from Mercedes-Benz now. Is Mercedes still wanting to be a part of the McLaren team when it makes one image disaster after another? Does Mercedes have to think about their relationship?


 


Norbert Haug: First of all I have to explain my role in the team. We are not running the team, we are a 40 per cent shareholder as everybody knows. I am one of the directors on the board of McLaren, and of course we discuss these issues internally. I am in permanent contact to Stuttgart, I am reporting to Dr Zetsche directly and of course we will sit down next week.


 


I'm not absolutely of the opinion that McLaren is creating one disaster after the other, in the meantime we won the world championship. I have full trust in Martin, just to point that out, and the whole affair is not what we want. Absolutely not. But still I have the feeling that these guys went and they were probably a little bit afraid of losing fourth place. And then all of a sudden they said no when they should have said yes. Because in hindsight you should have had a print out of the radio conversation, because you can look at it anyway. And if we are honest probably something like that has happened to all of us.


 


This is not an excuse, but we are not creating one problem after the other and I think we had a good relationship. I know exactly what money we are spending and I know exactly what positive values we got from last year. This is currently not a positive value – the newspapers are full of our stories. It is certainly not creating the right image. If it would not be bearable, then we need to sit down in Stuttgart and take our decision, but for now I have all the faith and all that I can put behind Martin. He is a great guy and runs the team in a very good way.


 


Q. There seems to be two interpretations of what has gone on over the past few days. One is this vast conspiracy of lies and the other just seems to be sort of incompetence in the way the situation has been handled. What's your response to that?


 


MW: There is no conspiracy of lies. Whether it is competence, incompetence, the fact is do I feel comfortable that I went on holiday on Sunday and I had a few days away of course I do. But that's in a pretty busy programme I think you have to do some of those things. Now that the scale and the enormity of it is clear you can look back, just as Dave, Lewis and feel that this is something so ridiculously small to start with and so innocuous that has grown into something so large. And that is something of massive regret. Ultimately as I have said earlier I am accountable to the shareholders at McLaren, and it is for them to make that judgement which I have no doubt they will do.


 

Q. Therefore you will not be resigning, it will be a question of them resigning?


 


MW: I'm not resigning this weekend. We've made a commitment to look at how we arrived in this situation and we've got to learn from it and we've got to do better in future. We will do a better job, I think therefore it is wrong to rule anything out, I've got to look at what is the best way forward for this team and how can we do better in the future.


 


Q. The German nation is waiting for a clear statement from Mercedes-Benz now. Is Mercedes still wanting to be a part of the McLaren team when it makes one image disaster after another? Does Mercedes have to think about their relationship?


 


Norbert Haug: First of all I have to explain my role in the team. We are not running the team, we are a 40 per cent shareholder as everybody knows. I am one of the directors on the board of McLaren, and of course we discuss these issues internally. I am in permanent contact to Stuttgart, I am reporting to Dr Zetsche directly and of course we will sit down next week.


 


I'm not absolutely of the opinion that McLaren is creating one disaster after the other, in the meantime we won the world championship. I have full trust in Martin, just to point that out, and the whole affair is not what we want. Absolutely not. But still I have the feeling that these guys went and they were probably a little bit afraid of losing fourth place. And then all of a sudden they said no when they should have said yes. Because in hindsight you should have had a print out of the radio conversation, because you can look at it anyway. And if we are honest probably something like that has happened to all of us.


 


This is not an excuse, but we are not creating one problem after the other and I think we had a good relationship. I know exactly what money we are spending and I know exactly what positive values we got from last year. This is currently not a positive value – the newspapers are full of our stories. It is certainly not creating the right image. If it would not be bearable, then we need to sit down in Stuttgart and take our decision, but for now I have all the faith and all that I can put behind Martin. He is a great guy and runs the team in a very good way.


 


Q. There seems to be two interpretations of what has gone on over the past few days. One is this vast conspiracy of lies and the other just seems to be sort of incompetence in the way the situation has been handled. What's your response to that?


 


MW: There is no conspiracy of lies. Whether it is competence, incompetence, the fact is do I feel comfortable that I went on holiday on Sunday and I had a few days away of course I do. But that's in a pretty busy programme I think you have to do some of those things. Now that the scale and the enormity of it is clear you can look back, just as Dave, Lewis and feel that this is something so ridiculously small to start with and so innocuous that has grown into something so large. And that is something of massive regret. Ultimately as I have said earlier I am accountable to the shareholders at McLaren, and it is for them to make that judgement which I have no doubt they will do.


 

亮了(0)
回复

Q. Why did the stewards not listen to the radio transmission before they interviewed the drivers and the people involved? Can you explain what the protocol is, and whether they had heard the transmission and they were trying to see if someone was going to lie and be put on a hook? Also, in the decision you took about Davey, did you consult Ron about that?


 


MW: In answer to the first one, certainly Davey believed that Charlie was fully aware of the radio communications. And Charlie was sat in there. When I asked Davey if he felt the stewards had listened to it, he did not know but he was on the assumption that this was information they either had heard or would hear as they contemplated the case. I guess frankly, and I am not trying to criticise any process, we are not here to do that, the stewards ultimately faced with the facts that they could see, made the right decision and we were heavily penalised for that.


 


This thing has unravelled by a heat of the moment panic. I don't think anyone could have contemplated that, so I don't subscribe to the view that the tape was listened to, and it was a trap that was set. Because it would not have seemed like a trap it was a very unusual and totally unpredictable outcome in my view.


 


Talking about Davey, it was my decision. On Thursday night I thought I would go and speak to Charlie because Charlie was there, and one of the questions I was going to ask was did he think he had lied, did he think Lewis had lied? In the end, I came to the conclusion without talking to the FIA, that I had no alternative with regard to Davey. So I made that decision. I wasn't prompted by anyone not the FIA, not Ron.


 


It was my decision, and it is one of those issues where on the one hand, if you do it you are accused of scapegoating, and if you don't do it you are accused of not taking matters seriously enough. So I realise in this situation that there wasn't going to be a right outcome and certainly I was going to be judged badly either way.


 


But the primary issue, was I had to do what I thought was right. And that was with a very heavy heart, because as I say Davey is to anyone, he is an incredibly hard working diligent individual, a very tough individual, who I had to shatter on Friday morning. But I have to accept that that was my decision. I think it was the right decision. However, sad that I am, I know Davey, I know his family, then having to talk about it in front of the media makes it a lot, lot harder. You want, inevitably, these decisions within the family to be private ones but clearly, as is demonstrated by what has happened now, we are not able to keep these things private. They are poured over in intimate detail, which is painful for Davey, for this team and for his family.


 


Q. After the stewards meeting in Australia, Davey must have come back along with Lewis and spoken to the team. Surely at the moment he would have told you what he told the stewards. So how come nobody at the team said to him that that was not what happened? And if that hadn't happened, why had he not discussed it with anybody?


 


MW: Davey didn't discuss it on Sunday evening. I am sure I spoke to him when he came back from the stewards, but there were a lot of things going on and we were packing up and leaving. He, even until Friday morning, did not believe that he had lied to the stewards and that is human nature to seek to justify to yourself. Again, while on Wednesday, there started to be the stories in the media, I was then travelling here and had no knowledge that the situation was going to accelerate.


 


I didn't expect the Australian stewards to be here. I didn't know there was going to be a stewards hearing again. And by the time I was here, obviously in the aftermath of Thursday evening, I spoke again to Davey and I spoke to Lewis, and there was a degree of denial still going on there. And, that is why I had decided to speak to the FIA but after a night of reflecting on it, [that is why] I came to the decision I did on Friday morning.


 

Q. Why did the stewards not listen to the radio transmission before they interviewed the drivers and the people involved? Can you explain what the protocol is, and whether they had heard the transmission and they were trying to see if someone was going to lie and be put on a hook? Also, in the decision you took about Davey, did you consult Ron about that?


 


MW: In answer to the first one, certainly Davey believed that Charlie was fully aware of the radio communications. And Charlie was sat in there. When I asked Davey if he felt the stewards had listened to it, he did not know but he was on the assumption that this was information they either had heard or would hear as they contemplated the case. I guess frankly, and I am not trying to criticise any process, we are not here to do that, the stewards ultimately faced with the facts that they could see, made the right decision and we were heavily penalised for that.


 


This thing has unravelled by a heat of the moment panic. I don't think anyone could have contemplated that, so I don't subscribe to the view that the tape was listened to, and it was a trap that was set. Because it would not have seemed like a trap it was a very unusual and totally unpredictable outcome in my view.


 


Talking about Davey, it was my decision. On Thursday night I thought I would go and speak to Charlie because Charlie was there, and one of the questions I was going to ask was did he think he had lied, did he think Lewis had lied? In the end, I came to the conclusion without talking to the FIA, that I had no alternative with regard to Davey. So I made that decision. I wasn't prompted by anyone not the FIA, not Ron.


 


It was my decision, and it is one of those issues where on the one hand, if you do it you are accused of scapegoating, and if you don't do it you are accused of not taking matters seriously enough. So I realise in this situation that there wasn't going to be a right outcome and certainly I was going to be judged badly either way.


 


But the primary issue, was I had to do what I thought was right. And that was with a very heavy heart, because as I say Davey is to anyone, he is an incredibly hard working diligent individual, a very tough individual, who I had to shatter on Friday morning. But I have to accept that that was my decision. I think it was the right decision. However, sad that I am, I know Davey, I know his family, then having to talk about it in front of the media makes it a lot, lot harder. You want, inevitably, these decisions within the family to be private ones but clearly, as is demonstrated by what has happened now, we are not able to keep these things private. They are poured over in intimate detail, which is painful for Davey, for this team and for his family.


 


Q. After the stewards meeting in Australia, Davey must have come back along with Lewis and spoken to the team. Surely at the moment he would have told you what he told the stewards. So how come nobody at the team said to him that that was not what happened? And if that hadn't happened, why had he not discussed it with anybody?


 


MW: Davey didn't discuss it on Sunday evening. I am sure I spoke to him when he came back from the stewards, but there were a lot of things going on and we were packing up and leaving. He, even until Friday morning, did not believe that he had lied to the stewards and that is human nature to seek to justify to yourself. Again, while on Wednesday, there started to be the stories in the media, I was then travelling here and had no knowledge that the situation was going to accelerate.


 


I didn't expect the Australian stewards to be here. I didn't know there was going to be a stewards hearing again. And by the time I was here, obviously in the aftermath of Thursday evening, I spoke again to Davey and I spoke to Lewis, and there was a degree of denial still going on there. And, that is why I had decided to speak to the FIA but after a night of reflecting on it, [that is why] I came to the decision I did on Friday morning.


 

亮了(0)
回复

Q. If Davey and Lewis had told the stewards that there was no call to pass Jarno, and yet on the radio transcript it was clear that it was. How come when they came back from the stewards, and even in passing conversation, they did not mention that? And how come no one said, we are going to get busted for that?


 


MW: It is clearly on the radio, and I think that the questions that were put were Davey interrupted a question that was put to Lewis, so he maintains that they did not answer the question which was: Was he asked to repass? And Lewis was asked, did you slow up to allow Trulli past? And Lewis said no, and at the time he had justified it to himself because as the telemetry later showed, he did not particularly slow up, he pulled over.


 


The two I am sure were uncomfortable, but we were not aware. And I've said to Davey: Did you deny the radio conversation? And his response on Thursday evening, was dont be ridiculous. Charlie was sat there. Charlie heard it, and it is recorded, how could I have done that? What I believe he did was, when Lewis was asked about it, before Lewis gave an answer, Davey interrupted the questioning and that is the start of this misdirection.


 


Q. McLaren's image as an ethical team has once again come into question. Are you expecting any commercial ramifications?


 


MW: Your premise is right, but this is something that has unfolded over a race weekend. In dealing with it, and going motor racing, I haven't spent time contemplating longer term. We have to, after this event, regroup and contemplate how we go forward.


 


Q. When a misdemeanour is committed by a group of people, usually action is taken against them. Davey Ryan has already paid a price, and he could pay the full price in terms of his career at McLaren, your own future is in question, do the team really believe Lewis was an innocent virgin being misled by the big bad wolf? Or will the team be taking action against him?


 


MW: The team and Lewis have been penalised because of this, and had the points and the race classification removed. I think there has been quite a lot of other suffering. I think Lewis has admitted that he is not entirely innocent, and I think he did that for himself very bravely two days ago. We've got to reflect on how we got from something so innocuous at the start to this situation, and learn from it.


 


Q. Will action be taken against Lewis?


 


MW: I don't contemplate any further action against Lewis.


 


Q. Going forward, the FIA is bound to be looking at this and previous times that you were up against them in the stewards office. Can you categorically say that Davey has never had a pattern of this behaviour before, and has never told half-truths in the previous occasions you have been up against the stewards?


 


MW: I can tell you what I believe, and that is that I believe Davey has 35 years of an unblemished record and I think that is my sincere belief, and that is the belief of most people in this room. In the heat of the moment, when he felt he had made a mistake, Davey was not trying to get an unjust result he thought, wrongly, he knee jerked into something that he thought was just securing the right outcome. But I do not believe that Davey has misled the stewards, or withheld information, from the stewards before.


 

Q. If Davey and Lewis had told the stewards that there was no call to pass Jarno, and yet on the radio transcript it was clear that it was. How come when they came back from the stewards, and even in passing conversation, they did not mention that? And how come no one said, we are going to get busted for that?


 


MW: It is clearly on the radio, and I think that the questions that were put were Davey interrupted a question that was put to Lewis, so he maintains that they did not answer the question which was: Was he asked to repass? And Lewis was asked, did you slow up to allow Trulli past? And Lewis said no, and at the time he had justified it to himself because as the telemetry later showed, he did not particularly slow up, he pulled over.


 


The two I am sure were uncomfortable, but we were not aware. And I've said to Davey: Did you deny the radio conversation? And his response on Thursday evening, was dont be ridiculous. Charlie was sat there. Charlie heard it, and it is recorded, how could I have done that? What I believe he did was, when Lewis was asked about it, before Lewis gave an answer, Davey interrupted the questioning and that is the start of this misdirection.


 


Q. McLaren's image as an ethical team has once again come into question. Are you expecting any commercial ramifications?


 


MW: Your premise is right, but this is something that has unfolded over a race weekend. In dealing with it, and going motor racing, I haven't spent time contemplating longer term. We have to, after this event, regroup and contemplate how we go forward.


 


Q. When a misdemeanour is committed by a group of people, usually action is taken against them. Davey Ryan has already paid a price, and he could pay the full price in terms of his career at McLaren, your own future is in question, do the team really believe Lewis was an innocent virgin being misled by the big bad wolf? Or will the team be taking action against him?


 


MW: The team and Lewis have been penalised because of this, and had the points and the race classification removed. I think there has been quite a lot of other suffering. I think Lewis has admitted that he is not entirely innocent, and I think he did that for himself very bravely two days ago. We've got to reflect on how we got from something so innocuous at the start to this situation, and learn from it.


 


Q. Will action be taken against Lewis?


 


MW: I don't contemplate any further action against Lewis.


 


Q. Going forward, the FIA is bound to be looking at this and previous times that you were up against them in the stewards office. Can you categorically say that Davey has never had a pattern of this behaviour before, and has never told half-truths in the previous occasions you have been up against the stewards?


 


MW: I can tell you what I believe, and that is that I believe Davey has 35 years of an unblemished record and I think that is my sincere belief, and that is the belief of most people in this room. In the heat of the moment, when he felt he had made a mistake, Davey was not trying to get an unjust result he thought, wrongly, he knee jerked into something that he thought was just securing the right outcome. But I do not believe that Davey has misled the stewards, or withheld information, from the stewards before.


 

亮了(0)
回复

Q. It is a well trodden ethos that McLaren wins as a team and loses as a team. How badly has that been damaged this weekend, and what will it take to repair it?


 


MW: I dont think it has been damaged. I think the team has pulled together. The loss of Davey is a huge hole in this organisation, and in reality it is not just picking up all of the things that he did, because there was no list of it, but it is about how we operate as a team, of McLaren and Mercedes, about how we come together positively to the circumstance. I haven't yet seen the benefit coming out of this weekend, because I am not quite that optimistic, but I do think that we have to learn from it and we have to be better in the future. So, I think that the team has held together very well this weekend and I am very grateful for the support that I have had and the team have had from lots of people here.


 


Q. One key touchstone of McLaren is that no one is bigger than the team. Did you contemplate suspending Lewis, if Davey Ryan had done something wrong and Lewis had not been as truthful as he might have been? Could you have stood him down for this race?


 


MW: There is no doubt, and Lewis has already accounted for himself, that what happened was very serious. I had to reflect on the fact that Davey, as sporting director was the senior member of this team. He had the duty of care to guide Lewis as an ambassador. We fell short in that regard and that is why I came to the conclusion with regard to Davey, and whilst Lewis inevitably just as a team comes out with blemish and shame, I think he has been penalised both in a tangible sense in terms of points removed, and quite a lot of other sense of pain and shame that has happened over the course of this weekend.


 


Q. What is Ron's involvement in all of this, and what sort of dialogue have you had with him? Is it true that he did not want Lewis to make the apology, and that he cancelled plans to be here on Thursday?


 


MW: Ron wasn't planning to be here officially. But Ron is a racer and this race last year he did not plan to come to but came at the last minute. I've had three or four conversations, relatively short ones, and in truth they were: do you need my help? How are you holding up? I am grateful that I had some sense of support from him. But he knows that I had to make these decisions. So I have had that sense of support, but Ron has not been pulling the strings on this one. And, it is clear that I have to take accountability for what has happened this weekend.


 


Q. When you took over the role as team principal, it was downplayed the difference that it might make to your role. Have the events of the last week changed your perception of the role of team principal, or maybe change how you approach the job in the future?


 


MW: I think it has been an accelerated learning curve, let's put it like that. I have been in this team for 20 years and I hope over those years I have made some contribution. This has been an experience that perhaps I was not as prepared for. McLaren, with Lewis Hamilton in it and with this sort of controversy gets a fair bit more attention than most of us are accustomed to. So I have to learn from that. I hope that once weve understood, learned from it, and can come out of it, then we can return to focusing on a racing team, which is what I joined in the first place to do.


 


Q. The FIA has made it fairly clear that it considers Lewis was put in an impossible situation and it is not going to take any action against him. You as a team are not off the hook. In your conversations with Max did you get the impression, or did he hint, that there would be a summons to the WMSC or further action against you?


 


MW: I think the reality is that I rang Max to tell him what was happened. I think he was kind enough to give me views and advice, and I think I have to treat that as a confidential conversation. Max was helpful and I am grateful for that, but it was not a conversation that I should be talking publicly about.


 


I rang him, one to inform him and to seek his guidance. I am not sure it is appropriate or fair that I then disclose what the content [of that conversation] was, but I very appreciative of the time he gave me on the phone. In the course of the conversation he did not refer to the [WMSC], I've spoken to Charlie and he didn't, and I've spoken to Alan Donnelly and it is clearly a decision that Max will take, and he will take the decision that he thinks is right.


 

Q. It is a well trodden ethos that McLaren wins as a team and loses as a team. How badly has that been damaged this weekend, and what will it take to repair it?


 


MW: I dont think it has been damaged. I think the team has pulled together. The loss of Davey is a huge hole in this organisation, and in reality it is not just picking up all of the things that he did, because there was no list of it, but it is about how we operate as a team, of McLaren and Mercedes, about how we come together positively to the circumstance. I haven't yet seen the benefit coming out of this weekend, because I am not quite that optimistic, but I do think that we have to learn from it and we have to be better in the future. So, I think that the team has held together very well this weekend and I am very grateful for the support that I have had and the team have had from lots of people here.


 


Q. One key touchstone of McLaren is that no one is bigger than the team. Did you contemplate suspending Lewis, if Davey Ryan had done something wrong and Lewis had not been as truthful as he might have been? Could you have stood him down for this race?


 


MW: There is no doubt, and Lewis has already accounted for himself, that what happened was very serious. I had to reflect on the fact that Davey, as sporting director was the senior member of this team. He had the duty of care to guide Lewis as an ambassador. We fell short in that regard and that is why I came to the conclusion with regard to Davey, and whilst Lewis inevitably just as a team comes out with blemish and shame, I think he has been penalised both in a tangible sense in terms of points removed, and quite a lot of other sense of pain and shame that has happened over the course of this weekend.


 


Q. What is Ron's involvement in all of this, and what sort of dialogue have you had with him? Is it true that he did not want Lewis to make the apology, and that he cancelled plans to be here on Thursday?


 


MW: Ron wasn't planning to be here officially. But Ron is a racer and this race last year he did not plan to come to but came at the last minute. I've had three or four conversations, relatively short ones, and in truth they were: do you need my help? How are you holding up? I am grateful that I had some sense of support from him. But he knows that I had to make these decisions. So I have had that sense of support, but Ron has not been pulling the strings on this one. And, it is clear that I have to take accountability for what has happened this weekend.


 


Q. When you took over the role as team principal, it was downplayed the difference that it might make to your role. Have the events of the last week changed your perception of the role of team principal, or maybe change how you approach the job in the future?


 


MW: I think it has been an accelerated learning curve, let's put it like that. I have been in this team for 20 years and I hope over those years I have made some contribution. This has been an experience that perhaps I was not as prepared for. McLaren, with Lewis Hamilton in it and with this sort of controversy gets a fair bit more attention than most of us are accustomed to. So I have to learn from that. I hope that once weve understood, learned from it, and can come out of it, then we can return to focusing on a racing team, which is what I joined in the first place to do.


 


Q. The FIA has made it fairly clear that it considers Lewis was put in an impossible situation and it is not going to take any action against him. You as a team are not off the hook. In your conversations with Max did you get the impression, or did he hint, that there would be a summons to the WMSC or further action against you?


 


MW: I think the reality is that I rang Max to tell him what was happened. I think he was kind enough to give me views and advice, and I think I have to treat that as a confidential conversation. Max was helpful and I am grateful for that, but it was not a conversation that I should be talking publicly about.


 


I rang him, one to inform him and to seek his guidance. I am not sure it is appropriate or fair that I then disclose what the content [of that conversation] was, but I very appreciative of the time he gave me on the phone. In the course of the conversation he did not refer to the [WMSC], I've spoken to Charlie and he didn't, and I've spoken to Alan Donnelly and it is clearly a decision that Max will take, and he will take the decision that he thinks is right.


 

亮了(0)
回复

Q. FOTA has been hugely concerned about the image that F1 projects to the fans, its customer base, yet we have controversy after controversy. You head up to the SWG for FOTA how badly do you think these various controversies, diffusers or this issue, are affecting the image of F1 worldwide.


 


MW: Well, it clearly isn't helpful. F1 is going through a very difficult time. We have a lot of automotive manufacturers who have made a tremendous commitment to F1 over the years. They have got huge challenges as businesses.


 


Ironically this year we have opened up all the radio conversations during the race. We have made our drivers more available. We are contemplating ways in which we can improve the spectacle and information for fans around the world. FOTA is a body that hasnt happened before. It is in its early days. There are diffuser controversies and a whole range of issues that challenge the unity that has been achieved within FOTA. There are a number of things that those within FOTA are very proud have been achieved in a few months, but as I have said several times this weekend, certainly McLaren isnt perfect.


 


We have made some big mistakes which are damaging to us. And we are very sorry for that. But they are also sadly damaging to F1 and the image of F1. That is not something that any of us can feel comfortable about.


 


Q. F1 is about drivers, not teams. McLarens role in this will probably be forgotten by the wider world, but the bit that wont be forgotten is the part of this affects Lewis and there have been comparisons now between Lewis and Michael Schumacher as being a great driver but having a tarnished career. He will carry this for the rest of his life, whereas you guys will be forgotten. How do you feel about that?


 


MW: Well, I feel sad. But I think Lewis has I think an enormous humanity. He has put his hand up and said that he has made some mistakes, and that he is deeply regretful of that. He has been very brave in making those statements that he has during the course of this weekend, and we for our part are trying to put our hand up and demonstrate our concern and our humility over what has happened.


 


It is not something that any of us feel very good about. Anyone who sits back and looks at what this started from, and what this started from, [knows] it is quite ridiculous. Although people like the idea of conspiracies or those sorts of things, it was an innocuous and silly incident where we were not guilty of anything that has led to this. I think Lewis is still a young man, but he is a world champion and he has to be accountable and responsible for his actions. He is an important ambassador to this sport, and I think the greatest shame that we as McLaren haven't given him and led him well enough to uphold the standards that he intended to or wanted to.


 


Q. What about the comparison to Schumacher?


 


MW: Lewis has openly and bravely admitted what he has done wrong, and he has apologised. I think that is in contrast with some other things that have happened in F1, so I think there is a difference.


 


This process, at the heart of it, are a group of committed, dedicated, hard working individuals who are fallible, and have made some mistakes in the heat of the moment. They are damaging, but I think people understand that no one is perfect, and it is for those people from that to decide whether they forgive and balance the equation of the greatness of various people.


 


I fully acknowledge and have a great passion for drivers, and the public ultimately are interested in the driver achievements and their bravery, but all of the 20 drivers that are taking the grid today are extraordinary young men with huge bravery, who are going to participate in a very dangerous, very exhausting, very challenging contest this afternoon. Sometimes there is a sense when we talk about F1 that we dont always appreciate that.


 


I have been very fortunate to work with a lot of great, great drivers. And Lewis is very much one of those, and people will ultimately judge him to be a great world champion, and hopefully a great multiple world champion, and they will recognise that he is human.


 

Q. FOTA has been hugely concerned about the image that F1 projects to the fans, its customer base, yet we have controversy after controversy. You head up to the SWG for FOTA how badly do you think these various controversies, diffusers or this issue, are affecting the image of F1 worldwide.


 


MW: Well, it clearly isn't helpful. F1 is going through a very difficult time. We have a lot of automotive manufacturers who have made a tremendous commitment to F1 over the years. They have got huge challenges as businesses.


 


Ironically this year we have opened up all the radio conversations during the race. We have made our drivers more available. We are contemplating ways in which we can improve the spectacle and information for fans around the world. FOTA is a body that hasnt happened before. It is in its early days. There are diffuser controversies and a whole range of issues that challenge the unity that has been achieved within FOTA. There are a number of things that those within FOTA are very proud have been achieved in a few months, but as I have said several times this weekend, certainly McLaren isnt perfect.


 


We have made some big mistakes which are damaging to us. And we are very sorry for that. But they are also sadly damaging to F1 and the image of F1. That is not something that any of us can feel comfortable about.


 


Q. F1 is about drivers, not teams. McLarens role in this will probably be forgotten by the wider world, but the bit that wont be forgotten is the part of this affects Lewis and there have been comparisons now between Lewis and Michael Schumacher as being a great driver but having a tarnished career. He will carry this for the rest of his life, whereas you guys will be forgotten. How do you feel about that?


 


MW: Well, I feel sad. But I think Lewis has I think an enormous humanity. He has put his hand up and said that he has made some mistakes, and that he is deeply regretful of that. He has been very brave in making those statements that he has during the course of this weekend, and we for our part are trying to put our hand up and demonstrate our concern and our humility over what has happened.


 


It is not something that any of us feel very good about. Anyone who sits back and looks at what this started from, and what this started from, [knows] it is quite ridiculous. Although people like the idea of conspiracies or those sorts of things, it was an innocuous and silly incident where we were not guilty of anything that has led to this. I think Lewis is still a young man, but he is a world champion and he has to be accountable and responsible for his actions. He is an important ambassador to this sport, and I think the greatest shame that we as McLaren haven't given him and led him well enough to uphold the standards that he intended to or wanted to.


 


Q. What about the comparison to Schumacher?


 


MW: Lewis has openly and bravely admitted what he has done wrong, and he has apologised. I think that is in contrast with some other things that have happened in F1, so I think there is a difference.


 


This process, at the heart of it, are a group of committed, dedicated, hard working individuals who are fallible, and have made some mistakes in the heat of the moment. They are damaging, but I think people understand that no one is perfect, and it is for those people from that to decide whether they forgive and balance the equation of the greatness of various people.


 


I fully acknowledge and have a great passion for drivers, and the public ultimately are interested in the driver achievements and their bravery, but all of the 20 drivers that are taking the grid today are extraordinary young men with huge bravery, who are going to participate in a very dangerous, very exhausting, very challenging contest this afternoon. Sometimes there is a sense when we talk about F1 that we dont always appreciate that.


 


I have been very fortunate to work with a lot of great, great drivers. And Lewis is very much one of those, and people will ultimately judge him to be a great world champion, and hopefully a great multiple world champion, and they will recognise that he is human.


 

亮了(0)
回复
由于这一篇专访工程浩大,我把它分成8份,可以单独接一个楼层。
由于这一篇专访工程浩大,我把它分成8份,可以单独接一个楼层。
亮了(0)
回复
我先接受78吧,晚饭之前交给楼主。
我先接受78吧,晚饭之前交给楼主。
亮了(0)
回复
鸟姐,不用这么速度。。。
鸟姐,不用这么速度。。。
亮了(0)
回复
可怜的小y,一天了都没人理你,那我接6楼吧。弄好了贴这楼里乜?
可怜的小y,一天了都没人理你,那我接6楼吧。弄好了贴这楼里乜?
亮了(0)
回复
[quote][b]引用第12楼 mariexsh发表的[/b]:
可怜的小y,一天了都没人理你,那我接6楼吧。弄好了贴这楼里乜?[/quote]
弄成文本格式发给我吧,摸摸。
[quote][b]引用第12楼 mariexsh发表的[/b]:
可怜的小y,一天了都没人理你,那我接6楼吧。弄好了贴这楼里乜?[/quote]
弄成文本格式发给我吧,摸摸。
亮了(0)
回复

翻译自3楼最后一个问题


Q: 你有没有考虑过你的未来,你与这支车队的未来?


MW:呃,如果我说我没有考虑过那就是在撒谎了.....,因为在这种时候,你会好好的想一想当初加入这项运动的原因,当然不是为了这类事情。还要考虑一下对于公司和这支伟大的车队来说怎样才是最好的。当然这件事对我来说不是一个好的经历,并不是我20年前投身于这项运动的初衷。  


不管怎样,大卫的离职是一个需要填补的巨大漏洞,坦白的说,他是我们一个极其关键的组成部分,他管理着这支车队。在外界看来有很多元老成为车队的吉祥物的时候,大卫至今仍然管理着这支车队,是他做出的那些造就了这支车队过往的成功的操作指令。在这样一个周末,一个十分艰难的环境下来告知大卫他将不再是车队的一份子,以及随之而来的苦恼和抑郁,更不用提我们还要为下一场比赛制定计划,还要深入的考虑这支车队在没有大卫以后的前景和未来,这些对我们而言都是极度巨大的挑战。


我认为我很幸运,这个周末对我来说有一些极为痛苦的时刻,但当你对人性的光辉有信心,对这支车队的恢复有信心时,还是有几个令人惊讶的时刻存在的。队内的成员通过善意的话语向我表达了他们对我极大的支持。对此我不仅仅应该只感谢现在在大马的车队成员们,还应该包括在布里克沃斯,沃金和斯图加特的支持者们,以及我们其他的合作伙伴,我也必须通过我认为最好的手段来稳定现在这个十分困难的局势。


长期来看,我可以盘算一下自己的未来。当然这不是我自己说了算的,我的未来并不掌握在我手上,而是由车队的股东们来决定的。他们需要决定什么是对车队最有益的。现在在我旁边坐着的就是我们最大的股东之一的代表,我认为最终还是由这些人而不是我来决定这支车队里的事情。  


Q: 这么说你不会辞职喽,问题会演变成别人是否辞职?  


MW:这周我不会辞职,我们决定来好好审视一下我们是如何陷入到现在这种境地的,我们必须要从中学习,并且在未来做的更好。我们会做到更好的,所以我认为现在开掉任何人都是错误的,我会为这支车队规划出最好的前进方向并且找到我们如何可以在将来做得更好的办法。  


Q: 整个德意志民族都在等待梅赛德斯.奔驰的正式声明,梅赛德斯是否还想成为这支灾难频发的车队的一部分?是否会重新考虑一下他们与车队之间的关系?  


Norbert Haug:首先,我要解释一下梅赛德斯在车队中的角色,我们不在运营这支车队,如同大家知道的一样我们只是40%股份的控股方。就我个人而言,我只是迈凯轮的一个董事会成员,我们当然会内部讨论最近的这些事情。我一直和斯图加特方面有联系,直接向Dr Zetsche报告,并且下周我们还会坐在一起讨论。  


我并不完全同意迈凯轮是一支灾难频发的车队这种说法,在这些破事发生的同时,我们赢得了世界冠军。需要指出的是,我完完全全的相信马丁,并且这整个事件都不是我们想要的结果,绝对不是。但是我还是觉得他们去了听证会,大概是因为害怕丢掉第四名的名次,所以在应该说是的时候他们说了否。现在,在事情发生之后再回过头去看,我们应该把无线电通话的内容打印一份带过去的,这样的话就可以随时查看了。而且如果我们是诚实的,这种做法大概就会推行了。  


这不是个借口,但是我们并不是在制造一个接一个的问题,我认为我们(与媒体)之间有着很好的相互关系。我知道我们投入的资金总额并且知道我们从去年(夺冠)中得到了什么样的积极的价值。现在所发生的---报纸上到处都是我们的故事---并不是一种积极的价值。这当然也不是在营造一种正确的形象。如果这一切演变到我们所不能承受的程度,到那时我们需要在斯图加特坐下来,好好谈一谈,做出我们的决定,但是就现在而言,我对马丁有着无比的信心。他是一个伟大的管理者,并且以一种非常好的方式在管理着这支车队。  


Q:最近几天来对于到底发生了什么好像存在两种解释,一种说这次事件是一个由谎言编织成的巨大阴谋,另一种说法是只是在情况的处理上出现了偏差,你对此怎么看?  


MW:这当中不存在谎言编织的阴谋。不管是处理的合适还是有偏差,事实是我是否觉得放心?当然我觉得放心,放心到我周日出发去享受了一个几天的假期。但是那是在一个及其繁忙的工作程序中,我认为一些这样的事情肯定会发生。现在这个事件的恶劣程度已经一清二楚了,回过头去看,就像大卫,刘易斯认为的那样,这是一个起初及其微小而无恶意的事件最终却发展成了影响如此之大的一件事情。我们对此满怀歉疚。最终,就像我之前说的那样,这个事件我要对迈凯轮的股东们负责,他们会做出正确的决断,对此我深信不疑。

翻译自3楼最后一个问题


Q: 你有没有考虑过你的未来,你与这支车队的未来?


MW:呃,如果我说我没有考虑过那就是在撒谎了.....,因为在这种时候,你会好好的想一想当初加入这项运动的原因,当然不是为了这类事情。还要考虑一下对于公司和这支伟大的车队来说怎样才是最好的。当然这件事对我来说不是一个好的经历,并不是我20年前投身于这项运动的初衷。  


不管怎样,大卫的离职是一个需要填补的巨大漏洞,坦白的说,他是我们一个极其关键的组成部分,他管理着这支车队。在外界看来有很多元老成为车队的吉祥物的时候,大卫至今仍然管理着这支车队,是他做出的那些造就了这支车队过往的成功的操作指令。在这样一个周末,一个十分艰难的环境下来告知大卫他将不再是车队的一份子,以及随之而来的苦恼和抑郁,更不用提我们还要为下一场比赛制定计划,还要深入的考虑这支车队在没有大卫以后的前景和未来,这些对我们而言都是极度巨大的挑战。


我认为我很幸运,这个周末对我来说有一些极为痛苦的时刻,但当你对人性的光辉有信心,对这支车队的恢复有信心时,还是有几个令人惊讶的时刻存在的。队内的成员通过善意的话语向我表达了他们对我极大的支持。对此我不仅仅应该只感谢现在在大马的车队成员们,还应该包括在布里克沃斯,沃金和斯图加特的支持者们,以及我们其他的合作伙伴,我也必须通过我认为最好的手段来稳定现在这个十分困难的局势。


长期来看,我可以盘算一下自己的未来。当然这不是我自己说了算的,我的未来并不掌握在我手上,而是由车队的股东们来决定的。他们需要决定什么是对车队最有益的。现在在我旁边坐着的就是我们最大的股东之一的代表,我认为最终还是由这些人而不是我来决定这支车队里的事情。  


Q: 这么说你不会辞职喽,问题会演变成别人是否辞职?  


MW:这周我不会辞职,我们决定来好好审视一下我们是如何陷入到现在这种境地的,我们必须要从中学习,并且在未来做的更好。我们会做到更好的,所以我认为现在开掉任何人都是错误的,我会为这支车队规划出最好的前进方向并且找到我们如何可以在将来做得更好的办法。  


Q: 整个德意志民族都在等待梅赛德斯.奔驰的正式声明,梅赛德斯是否还想成为这支灾难频发的车队的一部分?是否会重新考虑一下他们与车队之间的关系?  


Norbert Haug:首先,我要解释一下梅赛德斯在车队中的角色,我们不在运营这支车队,如同大家知道的一样我们只是40%股份的控股方。就我个人而言,我只是迈凯轮的一个董事会成员,我们当然会内部讨论最近的这些事情。我一直和斯图加特方面有联系,直接向Dr Zetsche报告,并且下周我们还会坐在一起讨论。  


我并不完全同意迈凯轮是一支灾难频发的车队这种说法,在这些破事发生的同时,我们赢得了世界冠军。需要指出的是,我完完全全的相信马丁,并且这整个事件都不是我们想要的结果,绝对不是。但是我还是觉得他们去了听证会,大概是因为害怕丢掉第四名的名次,所以在应该说是的时候他们说了否。现在,在事情发生之后再回过头去看,我们应该把无线电通话的内容打印一份带过去的,这样的话就可以随时查看了。而且如果我们是诚实的,这种做法大概就会推行了。  


这不是个借口,但是我们并不是在制造一个接一个的问题,我认为我们(与媒体)之间有着很好的相互关系。我知道我们投入的资金总额并且知道我们从去年(夺冠)中得到了什么样的积极的价值。现在所发生的---报纸上到处都是我们的故事---并不是一种积极的价值。这当然也不是在营造一种正确的形象。如果这一切演变到我们所不能承受的程度,到那时我们需要在斯图加特坐下来,好好谈一谈,做出我们的决定,但是就现在而言,我对马丁有着无比的信心。他是一个伟大的管理者,并且以一种非常好的方式在管理着这支车队。  


Q:最近几天来对于到底发生了什么好像存在两种解释,一种说这次事件是一个由谎言编织成的巨大阴谋,另一种说法是只是在情况的处理上出现了偏差,你对此怎么看?  


MW:这当中不存在谎言编织的阴谋。不管是处理的合适还是有偏差,事实是我是否觉得放心?当然我觉得放心,放心到我周日出发去享受了一个几天的假期。但是那是在一个及其繁忙的工作程序中,我认为一些这样的事情肯定会发生。现在这个事件的恶劣程度已经一清二楚了,回过头去看,就像大卫,刘易斯认为的那样,这是一个起初及其微小而无恶意的事件最终却发展成了影响如此之大的一件事情。我们对此满怀歉疚。最终,就像我之前说的那样,这个事件我要对迈凯轮的股东们负责,他们会做出正确的决断,对此我深信不疑。

亮了(0)
回复

[quote][b]引用第12楼 mariexsh发表的[/b]: 可怜的小y,一天了都没人理你,那我接6楼吧。弄好了贴这楼里乜?[/quote]


mariexsh筒子的翻译:


Q.即便大卫和刘易斯对干事说他们并未指令让亚诺通过,可无线电记录清楚显示他们有。他们从干事那回来的时候,甚至是会谈的过程中,为毛没有提到这一点呢?而且怎么会没有人说明,我们将会因此被抓到痛脚?


MW:无线电中说得很清楚了,我想问题在于大卫打断了一个本该刘易斯回答的问题,因此他坚称他们没有回答的问题是:刘易斯有被要求让回去吗?而刘易斯被问道的是,你有减速让特鲁利过去吗?他回答没有,当时他证明了这一点因为事后遥感记录显示他并没有明显的慢下来,他开到路边。


他们两个一定是有些不安的,但我们并没有在意。而且我对大卫说过:你有否认无线电通话吗?他在星期四晚上的回答是:“开什么玩笑,查理就坐在这儿,听到了这些并记录了下来,我怎么能这样做?”我认为他所做的是,当刘易斯被问到这个问题还没作答,大卫就打断了质询,而这就是误会的开始。


Q. 迈凯轮的诚信形象又一次受到质疑。你预见到一些商业影响了吗?


MW:你的前提是正确的,但这是在比赛的周末闹大的破事。处理这些还要参加比赛,我还没花时间考虑更久的事。在这一事件之后,我们必须重组并考虑如何前进。


Q. 当人们犯错之后,往往会有反对他们的行为出现。大卫瑞恩已经付出了代价,他也许会以他在迈凯轮的职业生涯为代价,而你的前途也不明朗,车队难道真的相信刘易斯只是被大坏蛋带领误入歧途的无辜小男孩吗?还是车队也会对他有所行动?


MW:车队和刘易斯都因此收到了惩罚,积分与排名都被取消。我认为这已经是很大的痛苦了。我想刘易斯早已承认他并非完全无辜,他两天前非常勇敢地承认了这一点。我们需要思考的是我们怎么会从一件本该无伤大雅的事混到这个地步,并从中学到些什么。


Q. 会对刘易斯有所行动乜?


MW: 我并没有考虑过对刘易斯采取进一步行动


Q. 展望未来,FIA一定会纠结这次事件以及之前你们去干事办公室面对他们的时候。你能肯定大卫以前从未有过这种行为,他从未在你们面对干事的时候只说出部分真相吗?


MW:我可以告诉你我所相信的,那就是大卫在35年中的记录从未有过瑕疵,这是我个人真挚的信任,也是这屋子里多数人所相信的。盛怒之下,当他认为自己犯了个错误的时候,大卫试图避免一个他认为不公的结果,下意识地做了些不恰当的事情,而在他看来,那仅仅是去保护正确的结果。但我并不认为大卫误导了干事或是对之前的干事隐瞒了信息。

[quote][b]引用第12楼 mariexsh发表的[/b]: 可怜的小y,一天了都没人理你,那我接6楼吧。弄好了贴这楼里乜?[/quote]


mariexsh筒子的翻译:


Q.即便大卫和刘易斯对干事说他们并未指令让亚诺通过,可无线电记录清楚显示他们有。他们从干事那回来的时候,甚至是会谈的过程中,为毛没有提到这一点呢?而且怎么会没有人说明,我们将会因此被抓到痛脚?


MW:无线电中说得很清楚了,我想问题在于大卫打断了一个本该刘易斯回答的问题,因此他坚称他们没有回答的问题是:刘易斯有被要求让回去吗?而刘易斯被问道的是,你有减速让特鲁利过去吗?他回答没有,当时他证明了这一点因为事后遥感记录显示他并没有明显的慢下来,他开到路边。


他们两个一定是有些不安的,但我们并没有在意。而且我对大卫说过:你有否认无线电通话吗?他在星期四晚上的回答是:“开什么玩笑,查理就坐在这儿,听到了这些并记录了下来,我怎么能这样做?”我认为他所做的是,当刘易斯被问到这个问题还没作答,大卫就打断了质询,而这就是误会的开始。


Q. 迈凯轮的诚信形象又一次受到质疑。你预见到一些商业影响了吗?


MW:你的前提是正确的,但这是在比赛的周末闹大的破事。处理这些还要参加比赛,我还没花时间考虑更久的事。在这一事件之后,我们必须重组并考虑如何前进。


Q. 当人们犯错之后,往往会有反对他们的行为出现。大卫瑞恩已经付出了代价,他也许会以他在迈凯轮的职业生涯为代价,而你的前途也不明朗,车队难道真的相信刘易斯只是被大坏蛋带领误入歧途的无辜小男孩吗?还是车队也会对他有所行动?


MW:车队和刘易斯都因此收到了惩罚,积分与排名都被取消。我认为这已经是很大的痛苦了。我想刘易斯早已承认他并非完全无辜,他两天前非常勇敢地承认了这一点。我们需要思考的是我们怎么会从一件本该无伤大雅的事混到这个地步,并从中学到些什么。


Q. 会对刘易斯有所行动乜?


MW: 我并没有考虑过对刘易斯采取进一步行动


Q. 展望未来,FIA一定会纠结这次事件以及之前你们去干事办公室面对他们的时候。你能肯定大卫以前从未有过这种行为,他从未在你们面对干事的时候只说出部分真相吗?


MW:我可以告诉你我所相信的,那就是大卫在35年中的记录从未有过瑕疵,这是我个人真挚的信任,也是这屋子里多数人所相信的。盛怒之下,当他认为自己犯了个错误的时候,大卫试图避免一个他认为不公的结果,下意识地做了些不恰当的事情,而在他看来,那仅仅是去保护正确的结果。但我并不认为大卫误导了干事或是对之前的干事隐瞒了信息。

亮了(0)
回复

因为这页是蛮核心的...所以大家参考...有意见尽快改正,免得误导... Page 5


[b]Q:[/b]为什么干事们在他们约见车手和参与这件事情的人们的时候没有先去听听车队的通话记录?你可以解释这究竟是怎么回事?是否干事们在听完车队通话后设下了一个圈套,看看谁说谎,谁上钩?在这里也请您说一下关于大卫瑞恩的处分,你是不是在作出处分前请教了罗恩丹尼斯?


[b]MW: [/b]在大卫瑞恩回答干事们所有的问题之前,他是完全相信查理怀特已经听过了所有的车队通话记录,因为查理怀特就在赛会干事间里面工作。而当我询问大卫瑞恩他是否真的确认赛会干事们在进行调查和做出判决时已经听了车队通话记录,他回答我他并不知道,但是他也承认他只是自己在认为赛会干事们已经听了那些记录。我并不是试图评论这整个判决的过程,毕竟我们并不在现场,而我很真心的认为:干事们根据了他们认为的最终事情,做出了正确的判断,而对我们做出了严厉的处罚。  


这个事情在突然间被揭发了。 我不认为有任何一个人可以平心的去看待这件事情, 而我也不同意大家在听到车队录音后而做出的判断--这是一个设计的陷阱(此处语带双关:1、这是迈凯伦设下的陷阱故意陷害特鲁利上钩。2、这是有心人故意设下的陷阱让迈凯伦上钩。因为在我的认为这整件事情并不像是一个陷阱,虽然这事情看起来很不寻常也超乎我的想象。  


 关于谈到大卫瑞恩的事情,没错,是我决定让他离开雪邦回家的。在星期二的晚上,我想我必须去见见查理怀特之前,那时查理怀特正好在雪邦,我问了查理怀特其中的一个问题就是:是否他认为大卫瑞恩在说谎?路易斯汉密尔顿在说谎?而在最后我实在没有办法,只能做出这样的选择——让大卫瑞恩回家。这是我的决定,我没有询问过FIA或者罗恩丹尼斯,这完全是我个人的决定。  


“让大卫瑞恩回家”已经是我的决定,这就像是那种一体两面的事情一样,如果你做了它你会被指责你是在推卸责任,而如果你不做这样事情也会被指责对事情不够认真,我很清楚这样的事情不会有什么好的结果,我只能接受大家的批评。  


但在私下说,我认为我做了我认为对的事情。尽管那是一个很沉重的决定,因为大卫瑞恩是一个极其勤奋,日以继夜工作的人,但,我依然认为我的决定是正确的。无论如何,这对于我来说,这是很难受的事情,我和大卫瑞恩很熟,我也认识他的家人,而要在媒体前谈论这些关于大卫瑞恩的事情,真的是很难受。在“让大卫瑞恩回家”这件事情上其实应该是在一个非常清楚的私人情况下,在车队里解决,但是,就像你看到的情况一样,这件事无法避免被曝露在公众面前。而对于大卫瑞恩、车队成员以及所有的人(包含赞助商、梅赛德斯奔驰…和迈凯伦的车迷,此处指McL’s family)这种无情的伤害排山倒海的袭击着每个人的内心深处。


[b]Q:[/b]在澳洲与干事们谈完话,大卫瑞恩和路易斯汉密尔顿一定会回到车队上和大家说说开会情况。无疑的,大卫瑞恩会告诉你他们和赛事干事说了些什么。所以,怎么可能车队里没有任何人和大卫瑞恩说这是不对的,这到底是怎么回事?如果我刚才问题中说的事情都没有发生,那为什么大卫瑞恩没有和任何人讨论这件事情?


[b]MW: [/b]大卫瑞恩在星期天的晚上并没有谈论这件事情,星期天的晚上有很多事情需要我们处理,我们都在准备打包和离开,而大卫瑞恩从赛会干事哪儿回来的时候我确认我和他谈过话。他——大卫瑞恩一直到这个星期五的上午还是不认为他对赛事干事说了谎,我想,每个人都会保护自己的天性,再一次说明,星期三,我正在来到雪邦的路上我并没有想到这件事情会经由媒体报道的原因使的事情演变成如此迅速不可收拾。  


我并不期望澳洲大奖赛的赛事干事出现在这里(指干事来到雪邦调查事情),我也不知道澳洲赛事干事们来到这里又会听见些什么。


 而在这个同时,星期三的晚上,我在雪邦知道了这个不幸的结果(指成绩因为“说谎”被取消),我再次找到大卫瑞恩和路易斯汉密尔顿谈话,我依然从他们那儿得到了他们某种程度上依然坚定的否定他们在说谎的看法。这就是为什么我最后决定当晚就去找FIA见面,然而,很不幸的第二天(星期四的早上),这种无法挽救的情况还是发生了,这就是为什么我在星期五的上午做出让大卫瑞恩回家的原因。

因为这页是蛮核心的...所以大家参考...有意见尽快改正,免得误导... Page 5


[b]Q:[/b]为什么干事们在他们约见车手和参与这件事情的人们的时候没有先去听听车队的通话记录?你可以解释这究竟是怎么回事?是否干事们在听完车队通话后设下了一个圈套,看看谁说谎,谁上钩?在这里也请您说一下关于大卫瑞恩的处分,你是不是在作出处分前请教了罗恩丹尼斯?


[b]MW: [/b]在大卫瑞恩回答干事们所有的问题之前,他是完全相信查理怀特已经听过了所有的车队通话记录,因为查理怀特就在赛会干事间里面工作。而当我询问大卫瑞恩他是否真的确认赛会干事们在进行调查和做出判决时已经听了车队通话记录,他回答我他并不知道,但是他也承认他只是自己在认为赛会干事们已经听了那些记录。我并不是试图评论这整个判决的过程,毕竟我们并不在现场,而我很真心的认为:干事们根据了他们认为的最终事情,做出了正确的判断,而对我们做出了严厉的处罚。  


这个事情在突然间被揭发了。 我不认为有任何一个人可以平心的去看待这件事情, 而我也不同意大家在听到车队录音后而做出的判断--这是一个设计的陷阱(此处语带双关:1、这是迈凯伦设下的陷阱故意陷害特鲁利上钩。2、这是有心人故意设下的陷阱让迈凯伦上钩。因为在我的认为这整件事情并不像是一个陷阱,虽然这事情看起来很不寻常也超乎我的想象。  


 关于谈到大卫瑞恩的事情,没错,是我决定让他离开雪邦回家的。在星期二的晚上,我想我必须去见见查理怀特之前,那时查理怀特正好在雪邦,我问了查理怀特其中的一个问题就是:是否他认为大卫瑞恩在说谎?路易斯汉密尔顿在说谎?而在最后我实在没有办法,只能做出这样的选择——让大卫瑞恩回家。这是我的决定,我没有询问过FIA或者罗恩丹尼斯,这完全是我个人的决定。  


“让大卫瑞恩回家”已经是我的决定,这就像是那种一体两面的事情一样,如果你做了它你会被指责你是在推卸责任,而如果你不做这样事情也会被指责对事情不够认真,我很清楚这样的事情不会有什么好的结果,我只能接受大家的批评。  


但在私下说,我认为我做了我认为对的事情。尽管那是一个很沉重的决定,因为大卫瑞恩是一个极其勤奋,日以继夜工作的人,但,我依然认为我的决定是正确的。无论如何,这对于我来说,这是很难受的事情,我和大卫瑞恩很熟,我也认识他的家人,而要在媒体前谈论这些关于大卫瑞恩的事情,真的是很难受。在“让大卫瑞恩回家”这件事情上其实应该是在一个非常清楚的私人情况下,在车队里解决,但是,就像你看到的情况一样,这件事无法避免被曝露在公众面前。而对于大卫瑞恩、车队成员以及所有的人(包含赞助商、梅赛德斯奔驰…和迈凯伦的车迷,此处指McL’s family)这种无情的伤害排山倒海的袭击着每个人的内心深处。


[b]Q:[/b]在澳洲与干事们谈完话,大卫瑞恩和路易斯汉密尔顿一定会回到车队上和大家说说开会情况。无疑的,大卫瑞恩会告诉你他们和赛事干事说了些什么。所以,怎么可能车队里没有任何人和大卫瑞恩说这是不对的,这到底是怎么回事?如果我刚才问题中说的事情都没有发生,那为什么大卫瑞恩没有和任何人讨论这件事情?


[b]MW: [/b]大卫瑞恩在星期天的晚上并没有谈论这件事情,星期天的晚上有很多事情需要我们处理,我们都在准备打包和离开,而大卫瑞恩从赛会干事哪儿回来的时候我确认我和他谈过话。他——大卫瑞恩一直到这个星期五的上午还是不认为他对赛事干事说了谎,我想,每个人都会保护自己的天性,再一次说明,星期三,我正在来到雪邦的路上我并没有想到这件事情会经由媒体报道的原因使的事情演变成如此迅速不可收拾。  


我并不期望澳洲大奖赛的赛事干事出现在这里(指干事来到雪邦调查事情),我也不知道澳洲赛事干事们来到这里又会听见些什么。


 而在这个同时,星期三的晚上,我在雪邦知道了这个不幸的结果(指成绩因为“说谎”被取消),我再次找到大卫瑞恩和路易斯汉密尔顿谈话,我依然从他们那儿得到了他们某种程度上依然坚定的否定他们在说谎的看法。这就是为什么我最后决定当晚就去找FIA见面,然而,很不幸的第二天(星期四的早上),这种无法挽救的情况还是发生了,这就是为什么我在星期五的上午做出让大卫瑞恩回家的原因。

亮了(0)
回复

Whitmarsh: Some people are out to get us


供稿:阿拉蕾


Some interesting stories...

Whitmarsh: Some people are out to get us
Monday 20th April 2009

Martin Whitmarsh has denied that Lewis Hamilton's mechanics are furious with the Brit, saying the reports are nothing more than a campaign designed to "get us."

On Sunday, the Daily Mail claimed that the McLaren mechanics were furious with Hamilton, blaming him for the sacking of sporting director Dave Ryan in the wake of the liargate scandal. Furthermore, they were also unhappy about rumours suggesting that the Brit was looking to leave the team.

"They have all known Davey for many, many years and are upset he became the fall guy," a McLaren team insider told the newspaper.

"Then there was the talk of Lewis threatening to quit the team. That did not go down well because we feel he should have shown more support after the work we've done for him. The guys put all the hours in and don't get anywhere near the rewards he does."

Whitmarsh, though, has refuted the report, saying he believes it's just a campaign aimed at unsettling those at Woking.

"Lewis has come to me at the last two grands prix and told me he loves the team and this is where he wants to be," the McLaren team boss told The Daily Mirror. "He's asked me what he can do to help.

"This talk of him being disliked by his mechanics over what happened to Davey is just rubbish. The reality is that there is an agenda here: some people are out to get us.

"But we have to accept things are going to be tough for a while and just get on with it.

"Champions have to be hard as nails, but Lewis is different because he also has this humanity and that gets misunderstood sometimes."

Whitmarsh: Some people are out to get us


供稿:阿拉蕾


Some interesting stories...

Whitmarsh: Some people are out to get us
Monday 20th April 2009

Martin Whitmarsh has denied that Lewis Hamilton's mechanics are furious with the Brit, saying the reports are nothing more than a campaign designed to "get us."

On Sunday, the Daily Mail claimed that the McLaren mechanics were furious with Hamilton, blaming him for the sacking of sporting director Dave Ryan in the wake of the liargate scandal. Furthermore, they were also unhappy about rumours suggesting that the Brit was looking to leave the team.

"They have all known Davey for many, many years and are upset he became the fall guy," a McLaren team insider told the newspaper.

"Then there was the talk of Lewis threatening to quit the team. That did not go down well because we feel he should have shown more support after the work we've done for him. The guys put all the hours in and don't get anywhere near the rewards he does."

Whitmarsh, though, has refuted the report, saying he believes it's just a campaign aimed at unsettling those at Woking.

"Lewis has come to me at the last two grands prix and told me he loves the team and this is where he wants to be," the McLaren team boss told The Daily Mirror. "He's asked me what he can do to help.

"This talk of him being disliked by his mechanics over what happened to Davey is just rubbish. The reality is that there is an agenda here: some people are out to get us.

"But we have to accept things are going to be tough for a while and just get on with it.

"Champions have to be hard as nails, but Lewis is different because he also has this humanity and that gets misunderstood sometimes."

亮了(0)
回复
3 min with Lewis by james allen


供稿:阿拉蕾

A lot of people are confused by the performance of Lewis Hamilton in the Chinese Grand Prix.

Rain is a great leveller in Formula 1. Talented drivers who do not have the car to compete in normal conditions can shine on a wet track and we have seen plenty of that over the years.

Wet races in the last couple of years seem to have been dominated either by Sebastien Vettel or by Hamilton. Hamilton delivered his masterpiece at Silverstone last July, but in Shanghai this weekend he had a very different kind of race, which showed that having the right car is just as important in the wet as the dry, especially with these 2009 cars.
www.mclaren.com

www.mclaren.com

He started brightly, attacking in the opening laps and making up places. He passed Raikkonen for 6th place on the first racing lap, then Trulli for 5th, then dropped back to 10th. He passed Kovalainen, Raikkonen again and was 4th on lap 24, with pace not too far off Button’s. He pitted on lap 33 and at that time his pace was comparable with drivers who were already on new wet tyres. So the tyres held up quite well in the first stint and all was going well. Perhaps the two safety car periods had given his tyres the right treatment.

But he pushed very hard in the opening laps of the second stint, fuel adjusted he wasn’t far off Vettel’s times. On lap 35 for example, he did a 1m55.153, a second faster than Button despite being significantly heavier and only 1.3 secs slower than Vettel (who was about to pit) despite his fuel weight slowing him by 2 secs/lap.

However he had taken too much out of the tyres. His pace dropped off after lap 44 and a spin on lap 49 lost him fifth place to team mate Heikki Kovalainen.

Here Lewis frankly admits that he didn’t deliver the kind of performance he expects of himself in those conditions. Perhaps the way the tyres held up in the first stint fooled him into thinking they’d be okay in the second. He didn’t think his way through the race..

That wasn’t what people have come to expect from you in the wet
“I love racing in the wet but I would say that was one of my worst wet weather performances. I made lots of mistakes. It was tricky out there, I was pushing hard, had quite good pace early on when I had some grip, but too many mistakes.

“You know me, I generally have good wet races, this one was incredibly tough. It was almost too dangerous to drive, you saw lots of people sliding off. I don’t have enough downforce on this car anyway, so it was a struggle but as least I scored some good points for the team.”

Did you push the car harder than it wanted to be pushed?
“All weekend I’ve been pushing that car beyond its limits and beyond what it is really capable of. Today when the tyres dropped off, I wasn’t able to avoid the oversteer moments.”

Why so many spins?
“There is nothing wrong with the car except the lack of downforce. I guess the guys with more downforce had no such a problem. My tyres were finished quite early so I was struggling with them. It was fun at the beginning when I had some grip. I don’t know if it’s the car or my driving style but it seems to destroy the tyres very early on. I remember I had just come out (of the pits) and they said I had 20 laps to go and my front left tyre was gone after 5 laps.”

What do you think about the performance of Sebastien Vettel?
“Congratulations to him, he did a fantastic job today. They have been very fast all weekend, so clearly they have one of the best cars.”

How long before you have a car which will allow you to race for a win?
“It’s going to be a good four or five races, it’s going to be some time. The guys are doing a fantastic job, so we’ve got to keep pushing.”
3 min with Lewis by james allen


供稿:阿拉蕾

A lot of people are confused by the performance of Lewis Hamilton in the Chinese Grand Prix.

Rain is a great leveller in Formula 1. Talented drivers who do not have the car to compete in normal conditions can shine on a wet track and we have seen plenty of that over the years.

Wet races in the last couple of years seem to have been dominated either by Sebastien Vettel or by Hamilton. Hamilton delivered his masterpiece at Silverstone last July, but in Shanghai this weekend he had a very different kind of race, which showed that having the right car is just as important in the wet as the dry, especially with these 2009 cars.
www.mclaren.com

www.mclaren.com

He started brightly, attacking in the opening laps and making up places. He passed Raikkonen for 6th place on the first racing lap, then Trulli for 5th, then dropped back to 10th. He passed Kovalainen, Raikkonen again and was 4th on lap 24, with pace not too far off Button’s. He pitted on lap 33 and at that time his pace was comparable with drivers who were already on new wet tyres. So the tyres held up quite well in the first stint and all was going well. Perhaps the two safety car periods had given his tyres the right treatment.

But he pushed very hard in the opening laps of the second stint, fuel adjusted he wasn’t far off Vettel’s times. On lap 35 for example, he did a 1m55.153, a second faster than Button despite being significantly heavier and only 1.3 secs slower than Vettel (who was about to pit) despite his fuel weight slowing him by 2 secs/lap.

However he had taken too much out of the tyres. His pace dropped off after lap 44 and a spin on lap 49 lost him fifth place to team mate Heikki Kovalainen.

Here Lewis frankly admits that he didn’t deliver the kind of performance he expects of himself in those conditions. Perhaps the way the tyres held up in the first stint fooled him into thinking they’d be okay in the second. He didn’t think his way through the race..

That wasn’t what people have come to expect from you in the wet
“I love racing in the wet but I would say that was one of my worst wet weather performances. I made lots of mistakes. It was tricky out there, I was pushing hard, had quite good pace early on when I had some grip, but too many mistakes.

“You know me, I generally have good wet races, this one was incredibly tough. It was almost too dangerous to drive, you saw lots of people sliding off. I don’t have enough downforce on this car anyway, so it was a struggle but as least I scored some good points for the team.”

Did you push the car harder than it wanted to be pushed?
“All weekend I’ve been pushing that car beyond its limits and beyond what it is really capable of. Today when the tyres dropped off, I wasn’t able to avoid the oversteer moments.”

Why so many spins?
“There is nothing wrong with the car except the lack of downforce. I guess the guys with more downforce had no such a problem. My tyres were finished quite early so I was struggling with them. It was fun at the beginning when I had some grip. I don’t know if it’s the car or my driving style but it seems to destroy the tyres very early on. I remember I had just come out (of the pits) and they said I had 20 laps to go and my front left tyre was gone after 5 laps.”

What do you think about the performance of Sebastien Vettel?
“Congratulations to him, he did a fantastic job today. They have been very fast all weekend, so clearly they have one of the best cars.”

How long before you have a car which will allow you to race for a win?
“It’s going to be a good four or five races, it’s going to be some time. The guys are doing a fantastic job, so we’ve got to keep pushing.”
亮了(0)
回复
1990 年 塞纳的playboy专访

In another thread we were talking about interviews with F1 drivers and then I brought up an interview that Playboy made with Ayrton Senna in 1990. I only had it in my language, so I quickly made a translation of it. It’s far from perfect, I know, but hopefully it’s understandable. I think it’s a great insight into Senna’s mind.

Please keep the discussion civil! Thanks.



Playboy: Let’s get on with it. At the last Brazilian GP you were so moved that you started to cry.

Senna: So many people were shouting my name that something got stirred up in me. I was the only Brazlian who could have won… That stirred up my emotions very much. Thank God that I was allowed to live this fantastic moment. But the fans only affected me before the start. After that it was only my own World that existed together with the machine and I didn’t think of anything else but victory. I was almost at my lap record, but then unfortunately everything went wrong.

Playboy: Why? Isn’t it time to tell us what happened?

Senna: I was running fantastically well. I was the quickest in trainings and I got pole position. I kept that position for almost all of the race. The problems started when the Japanese Tyrrell driver Satoru Nakajima was ahead of me. He was pulling off-line at the beginning of the corner and I was trying to overtake him which looked perfectly safe. But then suddenly he changed his mind and blocked the road. I guarantee that next time I will be more careful with him.

Playboy: More careful than you usually are?

Senna: Of course. Nakajima is erratic, like, by the way, so many are in Formula One. Experience teaches me slowly to use a different strategy to all of them.

Playboy: Some people say that although you are indeed the best driver currently, but you have a big fault: you are too reckless. Do you agree with that?

Senna: Enterpreneurial spirit, quickness and determination are characteristical of me, not just on the race track but on every other field of life. These are very worthy characteristics. But in certain situations a too strong character can backfire. I have so much willpower that from time to time it backfires. But that’s what it’s all about : you can learn some things only step by step.

Playboy: What do you think, can it be that you will never be able to win in Brazil?

Senna: Who knows? The Devil, who is the king in this World, can deprive us of some happy moments. But the real king is God. I trust in it very strongly that some day I will be given that happiness.

Playboy: How much hours did you sleep (the night) before the race?

Senna: Three. I got to bed at 3 am and I was already up at 6 am. Relaxing is very important, but unfortunately I couldn’t. I usually can’t sleep more than 6 hours before races. On normal days I sleep 10-12 hours. I love sleeping. But on such nights I simply can’t.

Playboy: What do you dream of?

Senna: In Brazil I was so tired that I didn’t dream at all. But it happens that I have nightmares about crashes, but sometimes I dream of meeting my girlfriend and giving her a big bouqet of flowers.

Playboy: But at the moment you are single, aren’t you?

Senna: Yes, I am.

Playboy: After a long relationship with Adriane Yamin, the daughther of the owner of Duchas Corona…

Senna (interrupting I have had other girlfriends before. But only few knew about them.

Playboy: You managed to protect your privacy even when it looked almost impossible, for example when you won your title in 1988. Soon after that came the biggest sex icon of Brazil, Xuxa. You didn’t make a secret of that relationship, like you usually do, so a lot of people thought and still think that it was a PR stunt.

Senna: As we are both famous, our lives are in the centre of attention and people started talk of everything like it usually happens. It was sad. But I guarantee that I never tried to publicize our love. When I meet a woman who stirs up my emotions then I live with her for myself, not for the public. I respect the one I love. But with Xuxa we couldn’t do the things like I am used to. She is less in control of her fame than I am. From the beginning our relationship was sensationalized. I was against that. I even had a conflict with people over this.

Playboy: With journalists?

Senna: No. With people who were responsible for it all. Who are responsible for Xuxa’s matters.

Playboy: Are you talking about Marlene Mattos, Xuxa’s manager?

Senna: I wouldn’t like to mention names. But when it started to spread in the press I was very disturbed by it. More and more people were saying it was just a PR stunt. But I swear it is not true. It was a very special period of my life.

Playboy: Did you get on well with Marlene?

Senna: Oh very much… she is a complicated person.

Playboy: Is it true that you asked her permission to date with Xuxa?

Senna (laughing I contacted Xuxa through Marlene as I asked her to give me her phone number. But I asked for nobody’s permission to date.

Playboy: When did you break up?

Senna: In March. Not long ago I have listened to her (Xuxa’s) interview on TV in which she talked about her privacy, among others about me.

Playboy: In that interview Xuxa said she doesn’t really have time for a love life and that you didn’t want to understand it and you were chasing her…

Senna: Without a doubt I had more time. But even so, we have spent together two weeks and then we were apart for four weeks. The biggest problem is that Xuxa lives for her job and she is living in her own World. I think I was one of the few who could get into that World. I think I grew to know her secret characteristics. But like her I am not an easy person either. So it was difficult. Xuxa simply didn’t give time for the relationship to blossom. She doesn’t have time to think about things like family and children. But you don’t get these things by a fluke. Xuxa is only dreaming but she is not doing anything to change her life.

Playboy: You wanted a more serious relationship?

Senna: So much that I asked her this question.

Playboy: And it wasn’t welcome?

Senna: No. But I had enough relationships already to know what I want. I am not interested in here and now but in the future. With the direction we were going Xuxa would have only been one of many. I didn’t want that. I had to realize that it doesn’t work that way.

Playboy: Who initiated the break-up?

Senna: Many people are curious of that, eh? Surely I won’t tell. But you will probably hear about that from some people close to Xuxa who always know about everything.

Playboy: At the end of the day was your relationship hindered by Marlane Mattos or not?

Senna: She didn’t help for sure.

Playboy: Have you ever really been in love?

Senna (after pausing to think In the past twelve years I had a lot of painful breakups (long pause), but I can firmly state that all my life there was only one occasion when I felt a strong desire to start a family. In all my life I only felt once that I want a child from somebody. And that somebody was Xuxa.

Playboy: You used to be married but you don’t like to talk about that. Why?

Senna: There are things that you don’t talk about everywhere. But perhaps it’s time to talk about it a little now. I got married in February 1981, I married a childhood friend of mine (Lilian Vasconeclos Sousa). When I started to race in Europe we moved there. I have to note here that she cooked very well. Then a lot of things happened and because of that eight months later I returned to Brazil to participate in my father’s businesses and stop racing. It didn’t go as I expected so in March, 1982 I decided to start a new life, go back to Europe and divorce.

Playboy: Lilian didn’t fit in your plans?

Senna: Our marriage was a mistake. We were too young. It wouldn’t have been lucky to continue that insecure relationship which would have been a source of even bigger problems if we had children. I didn’t regret it because none of us suffered too much. We don’t keep contact but I know she has a new family and she is happy.

Playboy: You didn’t love each other?

Senna: I don’t want to get into it. But I don’t regret anything.

Playboy: There was a rumour that your marriage was invalidated. Was there any basis to it?

(In Brazil a marriage can usually be invalidated only if one of the sides doesn’t fulfil his/her marital obligation.)

Senna: I don’t talk about my love life in public and I never boast with my girlfriends. Because they couldn’t ruin me on the track they used this against me and they created these stories which question my manliness. This is another very sad experience of my life. This invalidating story was just another absurd fantasy. Nothing like that happened. I have never commented this because I had nothing to be afraid of or to prove. But no lie can stand the test of time. As months pass the normal facts of my life slowly dissolve this unpleasant topic.

Playboy: Nelson Piquet poured oil on the fire, when he said you don’t like women. How did that affect you?

Senna: I was very sad. It was an incredibly destructive campaign against me. Because they weren’t able to blow me away on the track they wanted to ruin me with a personal matter. But even this attempt of theirs failed.

Playboy: This slander also affected Américo Jacoto Júnior, who was your secretary and who was your regular companion, and who you dismissed at the end. (Because there was a rumour spreading that Senna and Júnior had a homosexual relationship – Galko.)

Senna: Júnior was… my childhood friend, like a brother. It’s very sad that this absurd lie wasn’t just used to ruin me but also to hurt somebody who I like. I didn’t really dismiss him. Júnior was more my friend than an employee. When he finished University he didn’t know what to do and I asked him to accompany me. So he could see the World, study languages and he was a great company.

Playboy: Piquet was the reason why you became estranged?

Senna: Yes, there was a kind of estrangement, our friendship is not like it used to be. They caused an unbelievably great harm… (Senna pauses tensly for a while). It’s better not to talk about it. I wanted to tell here something… but I rather keep silent.

Playboy: What do you wanted to tell?

Senna: No, no, nothing.

Playboy: Something in connection with this matter?

(Senna switches off the recorder and talks about Piquet very passionately. He asks me to change topics.)

Playboy: Why don’t you use this opportunity to clear this matter once and for all?

Senna: (Silence.)

Playboy: You sued him for this. Does it satisfy you that Piquet backtracked on what he said earlier?

Senna: That doesn’t mean anything because he denied he ever said something like that. It was a very dirty game.

Playboy: You had a close relationship with Karherine, Piquet’s current wife, before they got married, didn’t you?

Senna: We didn’t have a close relationship. But….. I knew her.

Playboy: What do you mean?

Senna (emotionally I knew her as a woman, that’s all. I knew her as a woman.

Playboy: You never mentioned this. This fact alone wasn’t enough for Piquet to not to spread such things about you that we were just talking about?

Senna: There is nothing to support his claim that I don’t like women.

Playboy: Do you think…

(Senna switches off the recorder and say he doesn’t want to answer any more questions on it.)

Playboy: Because of your love for races one has the impression that you don’t think of anything else but cars.

Senna: When I work I indeed only live for the victory. I don’t have time to talk to the press. It only happens on special occasions. Like now. These are rare occasions but in substance they are so rich that whoever finds me aloof, will grow to like me (after reading it).

Playboy: Are you a loner?

Senna: I often feel loneliness. But I am positive that I will find the ideal person with whom I can share my life. I managed to calm myself that at the right moment I will meet this person. I can be patient. On the other hand I don’t live alone. I keep contact with my loved ones back in Brazil. I call my parents and my siblings several times a day. I never feel alone. I have never been alone either.

Playboy: Do you plan to marry for a second time?

Senna: Why not? But this time I want to hit the jackpot. I would like to have children – it would be very good to have a spouse. But it’s not up to us, is it? Everything is settled according to God’s will.

Playboy: When your son is four will you also give him a kart like your father did to you?

Senna: Only if he will be as talented as I am. But I won’t force him. I would show him other ways too and I would support him in anything he wants to do. He has to grow to love cars and racing by himself. I would defninitely not force him.

Playboy: Where is that old kart now?

Senna: Probably lying as waste material at some wreck yard. I have been playing with that for a couple of years then my father bought me a real kart. The old one was inherited by my brother, Leo. Once he played with it beside my father’s workshop. He was driving fast but careless. We called his name and he looked back while accelerating. He slipped, crashed into a wall and he almost slipped under a lorry. My father was so scared that he threw away the toy.

Playboy: Do you remember your first race?

Senna: I remember the first, the second, my first win… I remember everything. I was 8 when I first participated at a race on a Sao Paulo beach. My father didn’t like it because it were only boys around 18 of age participating. But I entered and I was very happy. We pulled the starting positions from a hat with paper slips. I pulled the Nr 1 – my first ever pole position! I was so small and light that my kart was almost flying and I led the race for a good number of laps. The big boys caught me in the corners but they couldn’t catch me in the straights. With only three laps remaining one of them crashed into me from the back and so a I spun off. But I almost won.

Playboy: Who were your heroes at the time?

Senna: Jackie Stewart, Gilles Villeneuve, Niki Lauda and of course Emerson Fittipaldi. He was the greatest.

Playboy: (Here the recorded tape was damaged)… would you be so quick, wouldn’t you? You were hardly making from one class to upper classes. (The question is apparently about that Senna wasn’t very good at the school. - Galko)

Senna: In the primary school things went reasonably well, I was always sitting in the first row. I started to drop back in high school. I was already building my castles in the air, dreaming about becoming a racecar driver. Instead of the first desks I was sitting in the middle, then in the back. And I was cheating during tests. Once one of my friends wrote my test instead of me. They accepted it – at least I didn’t fail my exam! But this was the lowest point. Then I got rid of this nihilism and I enrolled into the faculty of company management at the Sao Paulo University. But my thoughs were still elswhere. I attended classes for a month then I left school and soon after that I moved to Europe. That’s where everything started.

Playboy: And what did it feel like to sit behind the wheel of a F1 car for the first time?

Senna: It was a fantastic experience. It was in July, 1983 in Donnington Park, one day after the British GP. Frank Williams, the owner of Williams invited me to test. It was like a dream: to see that big, very sophisticated, World Champion machine close-up – and until that it was only driven by two drivers! It was a great feeling to know that I can ignite the engine, I can put it into gear and I can take it out from the pit. That was my day – not Williams’, not others’, just mine. I started with the car and I broke the lap record. It was a great experience. I remember I stepped up to the car, I was watching it, I caressed it, I tapped it tenderly and I said to it: “The time has come! The time has come!”

Playboy: Did you talk to the car?

Senna: Yes, indeed!

Playboy: Do you still talk to your cars?

Senna: No, it only happened that day. I talk to somebody else – to Him, up there (referring to God). In the past two years it became even more intense. I have had fantastic experiences. A new life has opened up for me.

Playboy: This dialogue of yours with God started in Monaco 1988 when you have crashed into the barrier despite of having an advantage of almost 1 minute in front of Alain Prost?

Senna: Exactly. That wasn’t just a driver error. There was such a big fight going on inside of me that it numbed me and made me vulnerable. I was open to God, but also to the Devil. The crash signalled to me that God is waiting to give me his hand. I only had to want it too. It was an incredible experiece. It’s totally different when people are only talking about God. But I could experience Him with my own eyes, own senses. No ambigousness, no misunderstandings. Only the certainty itself.

Playboy: What other similar experiences have you had?

Senna: If I don’t really like to talk about my love life, it’s even more difficult for me to talk about my relationship with God. This is an exceptional experience. This is my own World. In those eyes who don’t believe the whole thing is just a craziness, something stupid. That’s why I feel uneasy to talk about it. On the other hand: why not to share this experience with those who are looking for a new life, just like me?

Playboy: What kind of signs do you get?

Senna: After that 1988 accident God started to talk to me through the Bible. I opened the book, I prayed, I opened up my emotions, I was praying for enlightement. And I opened it exactly where my questions were answered and from where I got courage and presistence.

Playboy: Has anything more specific happened to you?

Senna: I will tell you one of my fresh experiences. In May, before the Monaco GP, in Saturday’s qualifying I realized that something is wrong with my car and I knew I had no chance to win Sunday’s race. There were similar problems with my teammate’s, Gerhard Berger’s McLaren. Well, the victory in Monte Carlo would have been extremely important and I explained that to God. He knows everything that is in our hearts but we have to give ourselves to Him by praying. I did just that. When race day arrived something strange happened to me during the morning warm-up. I could see myself from outside of the car. My car and body were covered in a white line, some kind of protective line of force.

Playboy: Did you see yourself from outside?

Senna: Yes.

Playboy: Did you leave your body?

Senna: Yes. I entered another dimension. I got incredibly relaxed and I felt that in body and in soul I am totally balanced and united. Each and every part of my body and soul was in harmony. Before the starts I am usually serious and silent. But this time I was smiling. I was rolling out from the pits with the same car which a couple of days earlier caused problems but now the problems were gone! Or it’s better to say that they were still there but I wasn’t bothered by them any more. After the race Berger came up to me and said that he still experienced the problems. I was just smiling but I didn’t go into details. I have had not the slightest problem during the race.

Playboy: Do you read the Bible every day?

Senna: No. But at other times I read it several times a day. From it I got to know the mighty God, who created the skies, the Earth and the Universe.

Playboy: Do you go to church?

Senna: I like to go when nobody else is there. When it’s empty and peaceful. I am Chatolic, but I don’t go to masses. That ritual doesn’t attract me at all.

Playboy: Especially if people realize you and ask for authograps?

Senna: No, it’s not because of that. But often the ritual has nothing to do with the essence, it’s very superficial. That’s not my World.

Playboy: When you won the 1988 Japanese GP an you became a World Champion for the first time in your life, you claimed that in the last two corners Jesus has appeared for you. How did that happen?

Senna: I was just thanking Him for the victory. God gifted me a really hard-fought race where I managed to get victory in the penultimate race of the season as it is the dream of every driver. I was concentrating very much during praying and I started to turn into a long 180 degree corner when Jesus appeared to me. He was huge. He didn’t stand on the floor but He was floating in the air in his usual clothes, with his usual colour and with his figure surrounded by a ray of light. His whole body was rising up to the sky, he was filling the whole space. And while I had this unbelieveble vision I was driving a race car! Precisely, strongly. Moved as it has to be. Isn’t it crazy? Crazy!

Playboy: You didn’t see anything else?

Senna: Nothing else. It is undescribable. I was talking to Jesus and he appeared. He simply showed himself to me.

Playboy: What did you think at that moment?

Senna: I was shouting while I crossed the finish line. I was hitting my head, I couldn’t believe it, then I started to cry. From the team many talked to me and I thanked especially to Steve Nichols, my mechanic. I was shouting a lot of things which I cannot repeat now.

Playboy: Swearing?

Senna (laughing Yes. Among others. The emotions simply burst out from me. Those seconds summed up the work, desires, dreams of a whole life and the victory. It was a real success with undisputed wins and not some World Championship won by collecting small points.

Playboy: Winning by race wins or points – isn’t it the same?

Senna: In each year every sport has its champion. But the champion is not always real, respected and admired, acknowledged by everybody. On the contrary: often the champion is a champion without victories, without merit and fight. Look, if a team like McLaren dominates the World Championship then only two drivers have a chance for victory. But victory is worth a lot more if you achieve that by your own strenght, not because others made mistakes – because your opponents crashed or something. I like to take my wins in the former method, I consider only that as a real victory.

Playboy: With that do you want to say that Alain Prost who won the Championship the next year…

Senna (interrupting … is a champion without merit. He was so aware of that that he never celebrated his victory. In 1988 I left Japan as a real winner. But a year ago Prost left as a loser. He didn’t win on the track, he didn’t win the title with a victory. Last year at the last race in Australia, which decdided the Championship, he was standing in the pits beside his car and he was not willing to participate because of the rain. He won the title simply by mathemetics. If I had participated in that last race could he call himself a champion now? Prost knew that in the race before I scored nine points, only I was disqualified and those points were taken away from me. If they don’t take them away from me I would be the champion. Is his title worth anything this way?

Playboy: In Japan you were disqualified because you came back on track with an illegal manouvre after you crashed with Prost. McLaren team owner Ron Dennis defended you. He said Prost deliberately hit your car. Is it true?

Senna: It’s clear to see on television. He realized that I was there and he did it deliberately.

Playboy: Is it true that after the race Prost went up to you and you almost hit him?

Senna: Almost. After what he did he came with this “oh I am so sorry” drama? It’s a little hard to believe. I told him to get lost and watch out for his life. In that situation this was the lightest reaction he could get.

Playboy: After you were disqualified from the race you claimed the Championship was manipulated in favour of Prost. Because of that FISA president Jean-Marie Balestre threatened you to DQ you from the races. This case went on for three months. During this time you always believed you were right?

Senna: One hundred percent.

Playboy: So why did you backtracked with your claims at Balestre’s demand?

Senna: It was that the truth was… (long pause). I can’t talk about this yet.

Playboy: When you claimed the Championship was manipulated, did your fans agree with that?

Senna: Yes.

Playboy: And you changed your mind in the last moment?

Senna: No, no, it didn’t change. This is the truth. It didn’t change. (He gets worked up.) But I cannot talk about this now. It would have serious consequences.

Playboy: It was more important to be able to keep on racing?

Senna: In certain moments that was more important but not in this case. I got to the point where I wanted to stop racing. I wanted to give up this job forever. But things suddenly changed and took a different direction.

Playboy: What happened?

Senna: I don’t want to get into details.

Playboy: What did it feel like when you were forced to withdraw your claims?

Senna: What you have just said isn’t true. But I cannot talk about it yet.

Playboy: Did you get support from any other driver?

Senna: Not so much that we could have achieved something practical with that. But there were some public comments by Michele Alboreto, Mauricio Gugelmin and Thierry Boutsen.

Playboy: From these which one…

Senna (firmly I cannot talk about this topic any more. Unfortunately.

Playboy: OK, so let’s put this clear: how did things get here with Prost?

Senna: The problems started in the middle of 1988 when I started to catch him and threaten his position in the team. The pressure grew and he started to panic. He tried to ruin the good working environment because only so he had a chance to beat me. With equal opportunities he couldn’t have done that.

Playboy: Your critics claim that while Prost set-up the car you were almost sitting in his lap and learning the tricks. Is that true?

Senna: I had to learn from him as he has great experience and he knows McLaren for many years. I can only learn from those who have knowledge and I can only beat them by learning from them. That was my strategy – and it worked.

Playboy: In 1988 they (McLaren) still tried to keep up appearances. But in 1989 in Imola the bomb set off. Prost accused you of betrayal and that you don’t keep the agreements between you. What happened?

Senna: As we had better cars than others we agreed that at the start we take care of the car and we don’t overtake into the first corner. After the start he took first position, however I caught his slipstream, accelerated and I could overtake him before the first corner. And then I quickly pulled a gap. Then he started to push so much that he spun and crashed. After the race he was furious. He blamed me for the defeat and he said that I didn’t keep the agreement. And that’s when the internal fight started.

Playboy: What is it about?

Senna: Imola was only the last drop in the glass, our relationship already turned sour in 1988 when he lost against me in the Championship. Prost was totally worn out. So much that when we went to England to test, he stayed in France and he threatened to quit racing. It would have been a big blow for McLaren as they couldn’t have replaced him with anybody at the time. Ron Dennis was desperately trying to find a solution. Then we made a deal (Senna and Dennis) that I will give the chance for Prost to backtarck (from his decision to retire). We three sat together and I admitted that I made a mistake. With that I left the emergency door open for him where he could get out from this situation.

Playboy: Prost’s version is different. He claims that you broke your agreement and that at the pressure of Ron Dennis you admitted that and you even started to cry.

Senna: That’s true. I was crying. His emotional state made a big impression on me. Prost was totally torn apart, he wasn’t in the state to keep on racing. He simply ceased to exist.

Playboy: Are you saying that you were crying because you felt sorry for him?

Senna: Exactly. But he was never able to understand that. The next week in Monaco he told a different version to the French press. I didn’t comment that. I kept my mouth and again I just swallowed. I wanted to prove it on the track that I was better than him. Accidentaly I had crazy luck: during race weekends I am usually alone but at that race Xuxa was there with me in my Monte Carlo flat. After I finished my job at the track I was running to be with her. So I didn’t have time to comment on our sour relationship (with Prost). But for me Prost ceased to exist.

Playboy: And what was Ron Dennis’ role in all this?

Senna: At the next race in Mexico Prost went to Ron to complain that I don’t talk to him. “After what you have done to him you want him to be your friend?” – that was the answer he got. With that his career was over. Ron didn’t want Prost in the team any more, but he didn’t know how to tell him. But Prost realized that immediately and he signed to Ferrari.

Playboy: But before you won the title, didn’t you say that Prost was the best driver in the World?

Senna: Indeed I said that. And among all drivers he is really one of the most talented.

Playboy: Is he the Professor as the French claim?

Senna: No, but he is a great driver.

Playboy: After you have beaten him don’t you think you are better than him?

Senna: It’s not a matter of words. This year I was leading in all of the first five races, I won three of them and I took four pole positions. The results speak for themselves. Of course, I have my own opinion which is pretty clear. But I would be badly advised to tell it.

Playboy: Ron Dennis swears that you are better (than Prost).

Senna: He worked with many great champions and he doesn’t just see the resutls but also how they are achieved. From Ron’s part it’s a rare praise.

Playboy: So that means you are forced to agree with him when he says: Senna is better?

Senna: I have no other choice.

Playboy: Before your relationship turned sour Prost said if he was a team owner he would sign you as a driver. Piquet also made a similar comment. And who would you sign?

Senna: This is not a realistic question.

Playboy: But by that you can tell us who do you think the best drivers are?

Senna: I won’t answer that. I don’t care if Mansell is the best or Berger or Piquet or Prost… they are all great drivers.

Playboy: You don’t let yourself trapped, do you? Are you really such a difficult guy as you seem?

Senna: I have a strong character and firm beliefs. Perhaps that’s why I have so many problems and that’s why I have enemies in Formula One. Besides a lot of people are irritated by my person.

Playboy: Are they jealous?

Senna: This feeling belongs to life.

Playboy: Piquet agrees with that. He claimed to Playboy that you are jealous of him.

Senna: That’s his opinion.

Playboy: He also said that when he read your contract with Lotus he realized you only got half of the money than what you claimed in the press.

Senna (in an ironic tone This is probably a misundetstanding or a mistake. Anyway he accepted my old contract. He even got less than what I would have got if I had stayed with the team.

Playboy: When at the end of 1987 Lotus announced the signing of Piquet you didn’t yet have a contract with McLaren. So seemingly it was like a dismission (by Lotus). How did it feel to be fired?

Senna: The truth is that it was my decision to leave. I got offers from Ferrari and McLaren and then I talked to Peter Warr, the team chief of Lotus and told him that I quit. He was trying to keep me by every possible means, even by promising more money - as long as he didn’t realize that I won’t change my mind. That’s when they were trying to find another driver quickly. In this difficult situation they found Piquet and they tried to make the World believe that they fired me. Anybody who doesn’t know the real story may think that I was running to McLaren after this, but in reality my negotiations with them were already pretty advanced at the time. We only didn’t sign the deal yet because it was pretty complicated.

Playboy: So you say that the signing of Piquet didn’t surprise you?

Senna: I was only surprised by the fact that the deal was made public before they informed me officially.

Playboy: But you didn’t even know that they were negotioating with another driver…

Senna: Of course I knew! I had contacts at Reynolds, the sponsor of Lotus and at Honda where we got the engines from. I got all the important, confidential informations from all sides. They were sitting in a London room at Reynolds office leading “secret” negotiations with Piquet while I already knew everything – even the moment when the contract was signed.

Playboy: How?

Senna: I was sitting in my own car, a Mercedes with a phone and I got calls from Reynolds. They were sitting there with Piquet and Lotus but they haven’t yet decided whether to sign the contract. They made it dependent on me. In the last hour one of the leading men stepped out from the room and called me and I confirmed to him my earlier decision that I leave the team. It was only after that when they signed the contract with him (Piquet). Piquet laughed but I was laughing before him. Those who love me were furious because they thought I was cheated. But the truth always comes to light – just like now.

Playboy: I think that’s why you always said Formula One is a disgusting circus. Do you mean the conflicts between drivers, the stewards, the teams or the sponsors’ interests?

Senna: Maybe I expressed myself a little too agressively. Formula One is a great spectacle. But like every great event it has its downside which takes a lot away from its beauty.

Playboy: Couldn’t a well functioning driver alliance keep balance in these interests? For example when you clashed with Balestre, couldn’t it have been a help?

Senna: There was a time when drivers still kept together, but by now that doesn’t exist any more. The interests are too different. There are some who are in a powerful position but they are on the other side of the barricade. Those who race at small teams or second tiers have hardly any power. I don’t waste my time with such an initiative.

Playboy: When you used the word “disgusting” describing F1, you certainly didn’t think of the beautiful women around the circus. Is it hard to resist temptation?

Senna: Of course, it is. There were occasions when I managed to resist and there were when I gave up the fight – every version happened to me.

Playboy: According to your Brazilian trainer Nuno Cobra you are not only a champion with McLaren but in another “field” as well…..

Senna (sips from his juice before he answers shyly Nobody complained yet. I am a tender type.

Playboy: Has it ever happened to you that you failed?

Senna: Yes, once. In 1982. I was almost a kid, I just started racing in England. The woman was unbelievably attractive. But I couldn’t. It was not that my manliness failed me, but I had to concentrate very much to do it.

Playboy: You had to ignate the turbo?

Senna (laughing At the time there wasn’t turbo yet. And my fitness wasn’t as great either as Nuno Cobra claims. But it was important that it happened. Until I was 20 my relationships with women were only defined by physical attraction. This was the sign that it’s not what is dominating any more. From that point I gave more importance to the personality and certain small details. This was the first sign of a big change inside of me.

Playboy: And what was your first time like?

Senna: The first time? I was 13. I remember together with one of my cousins, who was 20 at the time, we went to a club in downtown Sao Paulo. I was very small at the time so they didn’t let me in. Then I was sitting at the entrance watching the people going in. Suddenly I saw that a big, I mean really big, woman goes in. Soon after that my cousin came out with this big woman on his side. So that’s how it happened.

Playboy: Was she blonde or brunette?

Senna (with a big laugh It isn’t important.

Playboy: Why not?

Senna: Just because.

Playboy: Why are you so secretive?

Senna: She was blonde. And a prostitute. Later of course I realized that it had nothing to do with what is important but at the time it was good. At the age of 13 it’s difficult for a boy to find a girlfriend with whom he can have a relationship. Those 15 year old girls who are already willing, are looking for 18 year old boys. So I had no choice.

Playboy: Just one more thing: did it happen there in the car?

Senna (laughing No. In the woman’s flat. It was organized very well.

Playboy: You have a very turbulent lifestyle. Has it happen to you that for a long time you didn’t have any women in your life?

Senna: Huh, I cannot really answer that now… this is really very personal (silence). I think it happened to me after my divorce. For six months I didn’t even look at any woman.

Playboy: Why not?

Senna: I didn’t feel like. It was a very difficult period for me. I had the opportunity but I wasn’t thinking about that. And I didn’t meet any woman who was interesting enough to motivate me. The truth is that I have very high standards.

Playboy: Don’t the fans chase you?

Senna: It happens. Once in Italy a crazy woman was banging on my door. I opened it and she started to push me inside.

Playboy: And what happened?

Senna: I pushed her back to the corridor. (Laughs.) It was pretty funny.

Playboy: It never happened to you that you accpeted the offer?

Senna: It did. In 1988 after the Canadian GP an English girl asked me for a kiss. She used the word “hug” which I didn’t know. She asked: Can I have a hug? I got scared but Lisa, Ron Dennis’ wife who is American explained to me what it means. Then I said: Why not?

Playboy: Are you bothered by sex before races?

Senna: On the contrary. It’s good for me. I can face the race more relaxed.

Playboy: Did it ever happen to you that you got an aching stomach during a race?

Senna: Only before the start but then several times. During a race something far worse happened to me. I got cramped, every muscle of mine, so much that I couldn’t breath because of the pain. It was in 1984 during my second F1 race. I wasn’t prepared physically to drive for two ours in that heat, losing a lot of liquid. At the end the prospect of getting my first point made me go thorough until the finish line.

Playboy: How much weight do you lose during a race?

Senna: On average two kilos. If it’s hot, three. But you get that back very quickly if you drink enough water.

Playboy: How do you prepare yourself for the races?

Senna: Since 1984 with a physical conditioning programme. From December to March, when there aren’t races, I stay in Brazil where I run 8-10 kms five times a week on the sport track of the Sao Paulo University. When I start travelling I try to stay in a good shape. I have a regular companion from McLaren who gives me a massage and takes care of my meal during tests and trainings. I eat a lot of vegetables, carbohydrates, fish, chicken and pasta. For breakfast I usually have some kind of cornflakes and fruits. During race weekends from Thursday to Sunday I usually control my meals a lot more strictly.

Playboy: How does your pace of life change for the race weekends?

Senna. It changes in everything. My schedule determines strictly when I have to have breakfast, when I have to arrive at the track, when I have to get into the car, have lunch and go back to the car. Every step of mine is scheduled and the work is hard and continous. On the nights before races I try to go to bed early because the next morning I have to wake up between 7 and 8. These rules vary from country to country but my schedule usually doesn’t change. The aim is that I get to the track as balanced as possible.

Playboy: And what does your heart do before races?

Senna: It’s worse than most fans’ (heart)! Normally my heart beats about 60 times per minute. Before the starts it reaches 150! At the peak of the races it can even go up to 190!

Playboy: Is it because of the fear?

Senna: Because of the tension, because of the excitement of not to make a mistake during changing gears or overtaking. The fear comes when I am alone before the race. The danger of an accident is always there. I am very much afraid, not just of death but also of injury. Which is a good thing because it strengthens my life-instinct and stops me from crossing certain limits.

Playboy: Which was your most serious accident so far?

Senna: Thank God all I got thus far is a broken finger because of a silly crash in Interlagos, in 1974. Ten years later I had a more ugly accident in Hockenheim, Germany, on a very fast track. The wing of my Toleman broke off and at 280 kph I spun six times. I didn’t even have time to close my eyes. The only thing I wanted was not to get the hit from the front. I propped myself against my cockpit and I turned around to get the hit from the back. This is the best situation while crashing. A hit from the front can be deadly and it’s also dangerous to get it laterally. This was my most serious accident. But I have already had more risky situations.

Playboy: What was that like?

Senna: It happened in 1988 in Monaco, at the qualifying. I already took pole, but kept going. On every new lap I increased my advantage I was already two seconds ahead of them, which is an eternity over a race distance. I surpassed myself on every lap, I stepped into another dimension. Because of the big speed my sense of space and time changed, I suddenly saw a tunnel in front of me instead of the track. The difference between man and machine ceased to exist, I was united with the car, we became one. After five laps I felt something like a pinprick and I realized that I was in danger. I started to shake in my whole body then I returned to the pits.

Playboy: Were you very scared?

Senna: Of course. I was very scared. I still had the car under control, but I started to slip into the subconscious regions. And there I don’t know what can happen.

Playboy: Many people think that those who are driving around in circles on race tracks all their life, are a little crazy. What do you think of that?

Senna: Anybody who is not balanced enough won’t survive this job.

Playboy: Do you go to (psycho)therapy?

Senna: I have been twice, the last time at the end of 1988. I got to know many things of myself, it was very useful. If I had time I surely would continue.

Playboy: Is your life outside of the track is a race against time?

Senna: To a certain extent yes. I could do many things, for example advertising, with that I could make a lot of money. But I try to avoid these as racing consumes all of my energy. When I am in Europe I try to relax as much as possible. I go to bed early, I sleep until noon and I hardly leave my Monaco flat. I don’t even go out to have a lunch or dinner. My Portugese cleaning lady Isabel cooks very well. On late afternoons I go to jog. But I try to stay in Europe as little as possible. When I have a free week I go home to Brazil.

Playboy: And what do you do here (in Brazil)?

Senna: I try to keep away from my office where they always find some work for me (laughs). I like to be at home with my three nephews. Or I travel to Tauti, to my country house. There is a big lake there where you can jet-ski, waterski and play with remote controlled boats. There is also a kart track there where together with my five-year-old nephew Bruno we do some racing. I ride motorbikes, bicycle, I jog.

Playboy: Do you read a lot?

Senna: Very little. I don’t have the patience. That’s a big fault of mine.

Playboy: You don’t even read what they write about you?

Senna: Not really.

Playboy: And what about movies?

Senna: I like movies those are not slow.

Playboy: You like music, don’t you?

Senna: I love it. Usually I travel alone and then I always have my walkman and two casettes with me. When I arrive at the hotel I usually switch on the TV but I have little to do with these foreign programmes. I rather listen to music – any kind of music that my brother recorded for me. Of course I like Brazilian (music) the most.

Playboy: Do you go to concerts?

Senna: Not often. Mainly when I am abroad and I don’t have a company. When I’m in Brazil I rather like to stay at home.

Playboy: But you sometimes go out in Sao Paulo, don’t you?

Senna: Sometimes I go to a restaurant with my friends, sometimes even to clubs. I used to go to the Gallery (a club or a restaurant, I guess - Galko), but it was long ago.

Playboy: Has it ever happened to you that you drank more than you should have?

Senna (laughs I don’t deny it, it happened already. But I don’t drink much. I like wine and champagne. For example, after the Monaco GP I drank a bottle of wine which I haven’t done for a long time. However I can’t stand whisky and beer.

Playboy: Have you ever tried any kind of drug?

Senna: Does ether count as a drug? I have already smelled it. At first it was good, but for the second time it wasn’t so I stopped. I don’t need that. I didn’t start smoking either.

Playboy: So how does it feel like to be sponsored by Marlboro?

Senna: The name of the brand is on the car but with that I don’t force anybody to smoke. Philip Morris contributed a lot to motorsports. This company made the sport popular in the World and it made it possible for many to follow the races live. I view this side, not the negativities.

Playboy: But do you think smoking is harmful or not?

Senna: Without a doubt it’s not good for health. On the other hand there are people who stop smoking and gain weight.

Playboy: But people who never smoked don’t get into this situation. So your motto would be: “Don’t start it!”?

Senna: To be honest I would never participate in such a campaign. The reasons are obvious.

Playboy: And other campaigns? Didn’t the mayor of Sao Paulo, Luíza Erudina from the PT Party want to get your support for the nominee of the party, Lula?

Senna: That doesn’t matter. Almost every nominee wanted my support. But I am not a political type, I don’t know much about politics and I don’t even want to. I am independent and I voted for the one who wanted the best for everybody.

Playboy: Are Brazilian cars really bad wagons as President Collor claims?

Senna: No. The only problem is that they cost too much compared to European and especially Japanese cars. Also the restriction on technical import made the development of Brazilian car manufacturing harder. Now that they opened (the market) again the quality can only improve.

Playboy: What do you think the best road cars are?

Senna: I would import any Mercedes from Europe and from Japan Hondas. Toyota and GM also produces very good car. That’s what President Collor wants to introduce in Brazil as well.

Playboy: Brazilians can only hope that they will see you many times on the podium until the end of the championship. How would you react if during this time Balestre would mix you up with Jean Alesi and he would kiss you like he did to the Frenchman in Monaco?

Senna: That will never happen (laughs). Maybe once I will be able to talk about this topic more clearly. As openly as I have been talking about other matters of my life now.
1990 年 塞纳的playboy专访

In another thread we were talking about interviews with F1 drivers and then I brought up an interview that Playboy made with Ayrton Senna in 1990. I only had it in my language, so I quickly made a translation of it. It’s far from perfect, I know, but hopefully it’s understandable. I think it’s a great insight into Senna’s mind.

Please keep the discussion civil! Thanks.



Playboy: Let’s get on with it. At the last Brazilian GP you were so moved that you started to cry.

Senna: So many people were shouting my name that something got stirred up in me. I was the only Brazlian who could have won… That stirred up my emotions very much. Thank God that I was allowed to live this fantastic moment. But the fans only affected me before the start. After that it was only my own World that existed together with the machine and I didn’t think of anything else but victory. I was almost at my lap record, but then unfortunately everything went wrong.

Playboy: Why? Isn’t it time to tell us what happened?

Senna: I was running fantastically well. I was the quickest in trainings and I got pole position. I kept that position for almost all of the race. The problems started when the Japanese Tyrrell driver Satoru Nakajima was ahead of me. He was pulling off-line at the beginning of the corner and I was trying to overtake him which looked perfectly safe. But then suddenly he changed his mind and blocked the road. I guarantee that next time I will be more careful with him.

Playboy: More careful than you usually are?

Senna: Of course. Nakajima is erratic, like, by the way, so many are in Formula One. Experience teaches me slowly to use a different strategy to all of them.

Playboy: Some people say that although you are indeed the best driver currently, but you have a big fault: you are too reckless. Do you agree with that?

Senna: Enterpreneurial spirit, quickness and determination are characteristical of me, not just on the race track but on every other field of life. These are very worthy characteristics. But in certain situations a too strong character can backfire. I have so much willpower that from time to time it backfires. But that’s what it’s all about : you can learn some things only step by step.

Playboy: What do you think, can it be that you will never be able to win in Brazil?

Senna: Who knows? The Devil, who is the king in this World, can deprive us of some happy moments. But the real king is God. I trust in it very strongly that some day I will be given that happiness.

Playboy: How much hours did you sleep (the night) before the race?

Senna: Three. I got to bed at 3 am and I was already up at 6 am. Relaxing is very important, but unfortunately I couldn’t. I usually can’t sleep more than 6 hours before races. On normal days I sleep 10-12 hours. I love sleeping. But on such nights I simply can’t.

Playboy: What do you dream of?

Senna: In Brazil I was so tired that I didn’t dream at all. But it happens that I have nightmares about crashes, but sometimes I dream of meeting my girlfriend and giving her a big bouqet of flowers.

Playboy: But at the moment you are single, aren’t you?

Senna: Yes, I am.

Playboy: After a long relationship with Adriane Yamin, the daughther of the owner of Duchas Corona…

Senna (interrupting I have had other girlfriends before. But only few knew about them.

Playboy: You managed to protect your privacy even when it looked almost impossible, for example when you won your title in 1988. Soon after that came the biggest sex icon of Brazil, Xuxa. You didn’t make a secret of that relationship, like you usually do, so a lot of people thought and still think that it was a PR stunt.

Senna: As we are both famous, our lives are in the centre of attention and people started talk of everything like it usually happens. It was sad. But I guarantee that I never tried to publicize our love. When I meet a woman who stirs up my emotions then I live with her for myself, not for the public. I respect the one I love. But with Xuxa we couldn’t do the things like I am used to. She is less in control of her fame than I am. From the beginning our relationship was sensationalized. I was against that. I even had a conflict with people over this.

Playboy: With journalists?

Senna: No. With people who were responsible for it all. Who are responsible for Xuxa’s matters.

Playboy: Are you talking about Marlene Mattos, Xuxa’s manager?

Senna: I wouldn’t like to mention names. But when it started to spread in the press I was very disturbed by it. More and more people were saying it was just a PR stunt. But I swear it is not true. It was a very special period of my life.

Playboy: Did you get on well with Marlene?

Senna: Oh very much… she is a complicated person.

Playboy: Is it true that you asked her permission to date with Xuxa?

Senna (laughing I contacted Xuxa through Marlene as I asked her to give me her phone number. But I asked for nobody’s permission to date.

Playboy: When did you break up?

Senna: In March. Not long ago I have listened to her (Xuxa’s) interview on TV in which she talked about her privacy, among others about me.

Playboy: In that interview Xuxa said she doesn’t really have time for a love life and that you didn’t want to understand it and you were chasing her…

Senna: Without a doubt I had more time. But even so, we have spent together two weeks and then we were apart for four weeks. The biggest problem is that Xuxa lives for her job and she is living in her own World. I think I was one of the few who could get into that World. I think I grew to know her secret characteristics. But like her I am not an easy person either. So it was difficult. Xuxa simply didn’t give time for the relationship to blossom. She doesn’t have time to think about things like family and children. But you don’t get these things by a fluke. Xuxa is only dreaming but she is not doing anything to change her life.

Playboy: You wanted a more serious relationship?

Senna: So much that I asked her this question.

Playboy: And it wasn’t welcome?

Senna: No. But I had enough relationships already to know what I want. I am not interested in here and now but in the future. With the direction we were going Xuxa would have only been one of many. I didn’t want that. I had to realize that it doesn’t work that way.

Playboy: Who initiated the break-up?

Senna: Many people are curious of that, eh? Surely I won’t tell. But you will probably hear about that from some people close to Xuxa who always know about everything.

Playboy: At the end of the day was your relationship hindered by Marlane Mattos or not?

Senna: She didn’t help for sure.

Playboy: Have you ever really been in love?

Senna (after pausing to think In the past twelve years I had a lot of painful breakups (long pause), but I can firmly state that all my life there was only one occasion when I felt a strong desire to start a family. In all my life I only felt once that I want a child from somebody. And that somebody was Xuxa.

Playboy: You used to be married but you don’t like to talk about that. Why?

Senna: There are things that you don’t talk about everywhere. But perhaps it’s time to talk about it a little now. I got married in February 1981, I married a childhood friend of mine (Lilian Vasconeclos Sousa). When I started to race in Europe we moved there. I have to note here that she cooked very well. Then a lot of things happened and because of that eight months later I returned to Brazil to participate in my father’s businesses and stop racing. It didn’t go as I expected so in March, 1982 I decided to start a new life, go back to Europe and divorce.

Playboy: Lilian didn’t fit in your plans?

Senna: Our marriage was a mistake. We were too young. It wouldn’t have been lucky to continue that insecure relationship which would have been a source of even bigger problems if we had children. I didn’t regret it because none of us suffered too much. We don’t keep contact but I know she has a new family and she is happy.

Playboy: You didn’t love each other?

Senna: I don’t want to get into it. But I don’t regret anything.

Playboy: There was a rumour that your marriage was invalidated. Was there any basis to it?

(In Brazil a marriage can usually be invalidated only if one of the sides doesn’t fulfil his/her marital obligation.)

Senna: I don’t talk about my love life in public and I never boast with my girlfriends. Because they couldn’t ruin me on the track they used this against me and they created these stories which question my manliness. This is another very sad experience of my life. This invalidating story was just another absurd fantasy. Nothing like that happened. I have never commented this because I had nothing to be afraid of or to prove. But no lie can stand the test of time. As months pass the normal facts of my life slowly dissolve this unpleasant topic.

Playboy: Nelson Piquet poured oil on the fire, when he said you don’t like women. How did that affect you?

Senna: I was very sad. It was an incredibly destructive campaign against me. Because they weren’t able to blow me away on the track they wanted to ruin me with a personal matter. But even this attempt of theirs failed.

Playboy: This slander also affected Américo Jacoto Júnior, who was your secretary and who was your regular companion, and who you dismissed at the end. (Because there was a rumour spreading that Senna and Júnior had a homosexual relationship – Galko.)

Senna: Júnior was… my childhood friend, like a brother. It’s very sad that this absurd lie wasn’t just used to ruin me but also to hurt somebody who I like. I didn’t really dismiss him. Júnior was more my friend than an employee. When he finished University he didn’t know what to do and I asked him to accompany me. So he could see the World, study languages and he was a great company.

Playboy: Piquet was the reason why you became estranged?

Senna: Yes, there was a kind of estrangement, our friendship is not like it used to be. They caused an unbelievably great harm… (Senna pauses tensly for a while). It’s better not to talk about it. I wanted to tell here something… but I rather keep silent.

Playboy: What do you wanted to tell?

Senna: No, no, nothing.

Playboy: Something in connection with this matter?

(Senna switches off the recorder and talks about Piquet very passionately. He asks me to change topics.)

Playboy: Why don’t you use this opportunity to clear this matter once and for all?

Senna: (Silence.)

Playboy: You sued him for this. Does it satisfy you that Piquet backtracked on what he said earlier?

Senna: That doesn’t mean anything because he denied he ever said something like that. It was a very dirty game.

Playboy: You had a close relationship with Karherine, Piquet’s current wife, before they got married, didn’t you?

Senna: We didn’t have a close relationship. But….. I knew her.

Playboy: What do you mean?

Senna (emotionally I knew her as a woman, that’s all. I knew her as a woman.

Playboy: You never mentioned this. This fact alone wasn’t enough for Piquet to not to spread such things about you that we were just talking about?

Senna: There is nothing to support his claim that I don’t like women.

Playboy: Do you think…

(Senna switches off the recorder and say he doesn’t want to answer any more questions on it.)

Playboy: Because of your love for races one has the impression that you don’t think of anything else but cars.

Senna: When I work I indeed only live for the victory. I don’t have time to talk to the press. It only happens on special occasions. Like now. These are rare occasions but in substance they are so rich that whoever finds me aloof, will grow to like me (after reading it).

Playboy: Are you a loner?

Senna: I often feel loneliness. But I am positive that I will find the ideal person with whom I can share my life. I managed to calm myself that at the right moment I will meet this person. I can be patient. On the other hand I don’t live alone. I keep contact with my loved ones back in Brazil. I call my parents and my siblings several times a day. I never feel alone. I have never been alone either.

Playboy: Do you plan to marry for a second time?

Senna: Why not? But this time I want to hit the jackpot. I would like to have children – it would be very good to have a spouse. But it’s not up to us, is it? Everything is settled according to God’s will.

Playboy: When your son is four will you also give him a kart like your father did to you?

Senna: Only if he will be as talented as I am. But I won’t force him. I would show him other ways too and I would support him in anything he wants to do. He has to grow to love cars and racing by himself. I would defninitely not force him.

Playboy: Where is that old kart now?

Senna: Probably lying as waste material at some wreck yard. I have been playing with that for a couple of years then my father bought me a real kart. The old one was inherited by my brother, Leo. Once he played with it beside my father’s workshop. He was driving fast but careless. We called his name and he looked back while accelerating. He slipped, crashed into a wall and he almost slipped under a lorry. My father was so scared that he threw away the toy.

Playboy: Do you remember your first race?

Senna: I remember the first, the second, my first win… I remember everything. I was 8 when I first participated at a race on a Sao Paulo beach. My father didn’t like it because it were only boys around 18 of age participating. But I entered and I was very happy. We pulled the starting positions from a hat with paper slips. I pulled the Nr 1 – my first ever pole position! I was so small and light that my kart was almost flying and I led the race for a good number of laps. The big boys caught me in the corners but they couldn’t catch me in the straights. With only three laps remaining one of them crashed into me from the back and so a I spun off. But I almost won.

Playboy: Who were your heroes at the time?

Senna: Jackie Stewart, Gilles Villeneuve, Niki Lauda and of course Emerson Fittipaldi. He was the greatest.

Playboy: (Here the recorded tape was damaged)… would you be so quick, wouldn’t you? You were hardly making from one class to upper classes. (The question is apparently about that Senna wasn’t very good at the school. - Galko)

Senna: In the primary school things went reasonably well, I was always sitting in the first row. I started to drop back in high school. I was already building my castles in the air, dreaming about becoming a racecar driver. Instead of the first desks I was sitting in the middle, then in the back. And I was cheating during tests. Once one of my friends wrote my test instead of me. They accepted it – at least I didn’t fail my exam! But this was the lowest point. Then I got rid of this nihilism and I enrolled into the faculty of company management at the Sao Paulo University. But my thoughs were still elswhere. I attended classes for a month then I left school and soon after that I moved to Europe. That’s where everything started.

Playboy: And what did it feel like to sit behind the wheel of a F1 car for the first time?

Senna: It was a fantastic experience. It was in July, 1983 in Donnington Park, one day after the British GP. Frank Williams, the owner of Williams invited me to test. It was like a dream: to see that big, very sophisticated, World Champion machine close-up – and until that it was only driven by two drivers! It was a great feeling to know that I can ignite the engine, I can put it into gear and I can take it out from the pit. That was my day – not Williams’, not others’, just mine. I started with the car and I broke the lap record. It was a great experience. I remember I stepped up to the car, I was watching it, I caressed it, I tapped it tenderly and I said to it: “The time has come! The time has come!”

Playboy: Did you talk to the car?

Senna: Yes, indeed!

Playboy: Do you still talk to your cars?

Senna: No, it only happened that day. I talk to somebody else – to Him, up there (referring to God). In the past two years it became even more intense. I have had fantastic experiences. A new life has opened up for me.

Playboy: This dialogue of yours with God started in Monaco 1988 when you have crashed into the barrier despite of having an advantage of almost 1 minute in front of Alain Prost?

Senna: Exactly. That wasn’t just a driver error. There was such a big fight going on inside of me that it numbed me and made me vulnerable. I was open to God, but also to the Devil. The crash signalled to me that God is waiting to give me his hand. I only had to want it too. It was an incredible experiece. It’s totally different when people are only talking about God. But I could experience Him with my own eyes, own senses. No ambigousness, no misunderstandings. Only the certainty itself.

Playboy: What other similar experiences have you had?

Senna: If I don’t really like to talk about my love life, it’s even more difficult for me to talk about my relationship with God. This is an exceptional experience. This is my own World. In those eyes who don’t believe the whole thing is just a craziness, something stupid. That’s why I feel uneasy to talk about it. On the other hand: why not to share this experience with those who are looking for a new life, just like me?

Playboy: What kind of signs do you get?

Senna: After that 1988 accident God started to talk to me through the Bible. I opened the book, I prayed, I opened up my emotions, I was praying for enlightement. And I opened it exactly where my questions were answered and from where I got courage and presistence.

Playboy: Has anything more specific happened to you?

Senna: I will tell you one of my fresh experiences. In May, before the Monaco GP, in Saturday’s qualifying I realized that something is wrong with my car and I knew I had no chance to win Sunday’s race. There were similar problems with my teammate’s, Gerhard Berger’s McLaren. Well, the victory in Monte Carlo would have been extremely important and I explained that to God. He knows everything that is in our hearts but we have to give ourselves to Him by praying. I did just that. When race day arrived something strange happened to me during the morning warm-up. I could see myself from outside of the car. My car and body were covered in a white line, some kind of protective line of force.

Playboy: Did you see yourself from outside?

Senna: Yes.

Playboy: Did you leave your body?

Senna: Yes. I entered another dimension. I got incredibly relaxed and I felt that in body and in soul I am totally balanced and united. Each and every part of my body and soul was in harmony. Before the starts I am usually serious and silent. But this time I was smiling. I was rolling out from the pits with the same car which a couple of days earlier caused problems but now the problems were gone! Or it’s better to say that they were still there but I wasn’t bothered by them any more. After the race Berger came up to me and said that he still experienced the problems. I was just smiling but I didn’t go into details. I have had not the slightest problem during the race.

Playboy: Do you read the Bible every day?

Senna: No. But at other times I read it several times a day. From it I got to know the mighty God, who created the skies, the Earth and the Universe.

Playboy: Do you go to church?

Senna: I like to go when nobody else is there. When it’s empty and peaceful. I am Chatolic, but I don’t go to masses. That ritual doesn’t attract me at all.

Playboy: Especially if people realize you and ask for authograps?

Senna: No, it’s not because of that. But often the ritual has nothing to do with the essence, it’s very superficial. That’s not my World.

Playboy: When you won the 1988 Japanese GP an you became a World Champion for the first time in your life, you claimed that in the last two corners Jesus has appeared for you. How did that happen?

Senna: I was just thanking Him for the victory. God gifted me a really hard-fought race where I managed to get victory in the penultimate race of the season as it is the dream of every driver. I was concentrating very much during praying and I started to turn into a long 180 degree corner when Jesus appeared to me. He was huge. He didn’t stand on the floor but He was floating in the air in his usual clothes, with his usual colour and with his figure surrounded by a ray of light. His whole body was rising up to the sky, he was filling the whole space. And while I had this unbelieveble vision I was driving a race car! Precisely, strongly. Moved as it has to be. Isn’t it crazy? Crazy!

Playboy: You didn’t see anything else?

Senna: Nothing else. It is undescribable. I was talking to Jesus and he appeared. He simply showed himself to me.

Playboy: What did you think at that moment?

Senna: I was shouting while I crossed the finish line. I was hitting my head, I couldn’t believe it, then I started to cry. From the team many talked to me and I thanked especially to Steve Nichols, my mechanic. I was shouting a lot of things which I cannot repeat now.

Playboy: Swearing?

Senna (laughing Yes. Among others. The emotions simply burst out from me. Those seconds summed up the work, desires, dreams of a whole life and the victory. It was a real success with undisputed wins and not some World Championship won by collecting small points.

Playboy: Winning by race wins or points – isn’t it the same?

Senna: In each year every sport has its champion. But the champion is not always real, respected and admired, acknowledged by everybody. On the contrary: often the champion is a champion without victories, without merit and fight. Look, if a team like McLaren dominates the World Championship then only two drivers have a chance for victory. But victory is worth a lot more if you achieve that by your own strenght, not because others made mistakes – because your opponents crashed or something. I like to take my wins in the former method, I consider only that as a real victory.

Playboy: With that do you want to say that Alain Prost who won the Championship the next year…

Senna (interrupting … is a champion without merit. He was so aware of that that he never celebrated his victory. In 1988 I left Japan as a real winner. But a year ago Prost left as a loser. He didn’t win on the track, he didn’t win the title with a victory. Last year at the last race in Australia, which decdided the Championship, he was standing in the pits beside his car and he was not willing to participate because of the rain. He won the title simply by mathemetics. If I had participated in that last race could he call himself a champion now? Prost knew that in the race before I scored nine points, only I was disqualified and those points were taken away from me. If they don’t take them away from me I would be the champion. Is his title worth anything this way?

Playboy: In Japan you were disqualified because you came back on track with an illegal manouvre after you crashed with Prost. McLaren team owner Ron Dennis defended you. He said Prost deliberately hit your car. Is it true?

Senna: It’s clear to see on television. He realized that I was there and he did it deliberately.

Playboy: Is it true that after the race Prost went up to you and you almost hit him?

Senna: Almost. After what he did he came with this “oh I am so sorry” drama? It’s a little hard to believe. I told him to get lost and watch out for his life. In that situation this was the lightest reaction he could get.

Playboy: After you were disqualified from the race you claimed the Championship was manipulated in favour of Prost. Because of that FISA president Jean-Marie Balestre threatened you to DQ you from the races. This case went on for three months. During this time you always believed you were right?

Senna: One hundred percent.

Playboy: So why did you backtracked with your claims at Balestre’s demand?

Senna: It was that the truth was… (long pause). I can’t talk about this yet.

Playboy: When you claimed the Championship was manipulated, did your fans agree with that?

Senna: Yes.

Playboy: And you changed your mind in the last moment?

Senna: No, no, it didn’t change. This is the truth. It didn’t change. (He gets worked up.) But I cannot talk about this now. It would have serious consequences.

Playboy: It was more important to be able to keep on racing?

Senna: In certain moments that was more important but not in this case. I got to the point where I wanted to stop racing. I wanted to give up this job forever. But things suddenly changed and took a different direction.

Playboy: What happened?

Senna: I don’t want to get into details.

Playboy: What did it feel like when you were forced to withdraw your claims?

Senna: What you have just said isn’t true. But I cannot talk about it yet.

Playboy: Did you get support from any other driver?

Senna: Not so much that we could have achieved something practical with that. But there were some public comments by Michele Alboreto, Mauricio Gugelmin and Thierry Boutsen.

Playboy: From these which one…

Senna (firmly I cannot talk about this topic any more. Unfortunately.

Playboy: OK, so let’s put this clear: how did things get here with Prost?

Senna: The problems started in the middle of 1988 when I started to catch him and threaten his position in the team. The pressure grew and he started to panic. He tried to ruin the good working environment because only so he had a chance to beat me. With equal opportunities he couldn’t have done that.

Playboy: Your critics claim that while Prost set-up the car you were almost sitting in his lap and learning the tricks. Is that true?

Senna: I had to learn from him as he has great experience and he knows McLaren for many years. I can only learn from those who have knowledge and I can only beat them by learning from them. That was my strategy – and it worked.

Playboy: In 1988 they (McLaren) still tried to keep up appearances. But in 1989 in Imola the bomb set off. Prost accused you of betrayal and that you don’t keep the agreements between you. What happened?

Senna: As we had better cars than others we agreed that at the start we take care of the car and we don’t overtake into the first corner. After the start he took first position, however I caught his slipstream, accelerated and I could overtake him before the first corner. And then I quickly pulled a gap. Then he started to push so much that he spun and crashed. After the race he was furious. He blamed me for the defeat and he said that I didn’t keep the agreement. And that’s when the internal fight started.

Playboy: What is it about?

Senna: Imola was only the last drop in the glass, our relationship already turned sour in 1988 when he lost against me in the Championship. Prost was totally worn out. So much that when we went to England to test, he stayed in France and he threatened to quit racing. It would have been a big blow for McLaren as they couldn’t have replaced him with anybody at the time. Ron Dennis was desperately trying to find a solution. Then we made a deal (Senna and Dennis) that I will give the chance for Prost to backtarck (from his decision to retire). We three sat together and I admitted that I made a mistake. With that I left the emergency door open for him where he could get out from this situation.

Playboy: Prost’s version is different. He claims that you broke your agreement and that at the pressure of Ron Dennis you admitted that and you even started to cry.

Senna: That’s true. I was crying. His emotional state made a big impression on me. Prost was totally torn apart, he wasn’t in the state to keep on racing. He simply ceased to exist.

Playboy: Are you saying that you were crying because you felt sorry for him?

Senna: Exactly. But he was never able to understand that. The next week in Monaco he told a different version to the French press. I didn’t comment that. I kept my mouth and again I just swallowed. I wanted to prove it on the track that I was better than him. Accidentaly I had crazy luck: during race weekends I am usually alone but at that race Xuxa was there with me in my Monte Carlo flat. After I finished my job at the track I was running to be with her. So I didn’t have time to comment on our sour relationship (with Prost). But for me Prost ceased to exist.

Playboy: And what was Ron Dennis’ role in all this?

Senna: At the next race in Mexico Prost went to Ron to complain that I don’t talk to him. “After what you have done to him you want him to be your friend?” – that was the answer he got. With that his career was over. Ron didn’t want Prost in the team any more, but he didn’t know how to tell him. But Prost realized that immediately and he signed to Ferrari.

Playboy: But before you won the title, didn’t you say that Prost was the best driver in the World?

Senna: Indeed I said that. And among all drivers he is really one of the most talented.

Playboy: Is he the Professor as the French claim?

Senna: No, but he is a great driver.

Playboy: After you have beaten him don’t you think you are better than him?

Senna: It’s not a matter of words. This year I was leading in all of the first five races, I won three of them and I took four pole positions. The results speak for themselves. Of course, I have my own opinion which is pretty clear. But I would be badly advised to tell it.

Playboy: Ron Dennis swears that you are better (than Prost).

Senna: He worked with many great champions and he doesn’t just see the resutls but also how they are achieved. From Ron’s part it’s a rare praise.

Playboy: So that means you are forced to agree with him when he says: Senna is better?

Senna: I have no other choice.

Playboy: Before your relationship turned sour Prost said if he was a team owner he would sign you as a driver. Piquet also made a similar comment. And who would you sign?

Senna: This is not a realistic question.

Playboy: But by that you can tell us who do you think the best drivers are?

Senna: I won’t answer that. I don’t care if Mansell is the best or Berger or Piquet or Prost… they are all great drivers.

Playboy: You don’t let yourself trapped, do you? Are you really such a difficult guy as you seem?

Senna: I have a strong character and firm beliefs. Perhaps that’s why I have so many problems and that’s why I have enemies in Formula One. Besides a lot of people are irritated by my person.

Playboy: Are they jealous?

Senna: This feeling belongs to life.

Playboy: Piquet agrees with that. He claimed to Playboy that you are jealous of him.

Senna: That’s his opinion.

Playboy: He also said that when he read your contract with Lotus he realized you only got half of the money than what you claimed in the press.

Senna (in an ironic tone This is probably a misundetstanding or a mistake. Anyway he accepted my old contract. He even got less than what I would have got if I had stayed with the team.

Playboy: When at the end of 1987 Lotus announced the signing of Piquet you didn’t yet have a contract with McLaren. So seemingly it was like a dismission (by Lotus). How did it feel to be fired?

Senna: The truth is that it was my decision to leave. I got offers from Ferrari and McLaren and then I talked to Peter Warr, the team chief of Lotus and told him that I quit. He was trying to keep me by every possible means, even by promising more money - as long as he didn’t realize that I won’t change my mind. That’s when they were trying to find another driver quickly. In this difficult situation they found Piquet and they tried to make the World believe that they fired me. Anybody who doesn’t know the real story may think that I was running to McLaren after this, but in reality my negotiations with them were already pretty advanced at the time. We only didn’t sign the deal yet because it was pretty complicated.

Playboy: So you say that the signing of Piquet didn’t surprise you?

Senna: I was only surprised by the fact that the deal was made public before they informed me officially.

Playboy: But you didn’t even know that they were negotioating with another driver…

Senna: Of course I knew! I had contacts at Reynolds, the sponsor of Lotus and at Honda where we got the engines from. I got all the important, confidential informations from all sides. They were sitting in a London room at Reynolds office leading “secret” negotiations with Piquet while I already knew everything – even the moment when the contract was signed.

Playboy: How?

Senna: I was sitting in my own car, a Mercedes with a phone and I got calls from Reynolds. They were sitting there with Piquet and Lotus but they haven’t yet decided whether to sign the contract. They made it dependent on me. In the last hour one of the leading men stepped out from the room and called me and I confirmed to him my earlier decision that I leave the team. It was only after that when they signed the contract with him (Piquet). Piquet laughed but I was laughing before him. Those who love me were furious because they thought I was cheated. But the truth always comes to light – just like now.

Playboy: I think that’s why you always said Formula One is a disgusting circus. Do you mean the conflicts between drivers, the stewards, the teams or the sponsors’ interests?

Senna: Maybe I expressed myself a little too agressively. Formula One is a great spectacle. But like every great event it has its downside which takes a lot away from its beauty.

Playboy: Couldn’t a well functioning driver alliance keep balance in these interests? For example when you clashed with Balestre, couldn’t it have been a help?

Senna: There was a time when drivers still kept together, but by now that doesn’t exist any more. The interests are too different. There are some who are in a powerful position but they are on the other side of the barricade. Those who race at small teams or second tiers have hardly any power. I don’t waste my time with such an initiative.

Playboy: When you used the word “disgusting” describing F1, you certainly didn’t think of the beautiful women around the circus. Is it hard to resist temptation?

Senna: Of course, it is. There were occasions when I managed to resist and there were when I gave up the fight – every version happened to me.

Playboy: According to your Brazilian trainer Nuno Cobra you are not only a champion with McLaren but in another “field” as well…..

Senna (sips from his juice before he answers shyly Nobody complained yet. I am a tender type.

Playboy: Has it ever happened to you that you failed?

Senna: Yes, once. In 1982. I was almost a kid, I just started racing in England. The woman was unbelievably attractive. But I couldn’t. It was not that my manliness failed me, but I had to concentrate very much to do it.

Playboy: You had to ignate the turbo?

Senna (laughing At the time there wasn’t turbo yet. And my fitness wasn’t as great either as Nuno Cobra claims. But it was important that it happened. Until I was 20 my relationships with women were only defined by physical attraction. This was the sign that it’s not what is dominating any more. From that point I gave more importance to the personality and certain small details. This was the first sign of a big change inside of me.

Playboy: And what was your first time like?

Senna: The first time? I was 13. I remember together with one of my cousins, who was 20 at the time, we went to a club in downtown Sao Paulo. I was very small at the time so they didn’t let me in. Then I was sitting at the entrance watching the people going in. Suddenly I saw that a big, I mean really big, woman goes in. Soon after that my cousin came out with this big woman on his side. So that’s how it happened.

Playboy: Was she blonde or brunette?

Senna (with a big laugh It isn’t important.

Playboy: Why not?

Senna: Just because.

Playboy: Why are you so secretive?

Senna: She was blonde. And a prostitute. Later of course I realized that it had nothing to do with what is important but at the time it was good. At the age of 13 it’s difficult for a boy to find a girlfriend with whom he can have a relationship. Those 15 year old girls who are already willing, are looking for 18 year old boys. So I had no choice.

Playboy: Just one more thing: did it happen there in the car?

Senna (laughing No. In the woman’s flat. It was organized very well.

Playboy: You have a very turbulent lifestyle. Has it happen to you that for a long time you didn’t have any women in your life?

Senna: Huh, I cannot really answer that now… this is really very personal (silence). I think it happened to me after my divorce. For six months I didn’t even look at any woman.

Playboy: Why not?

Senna: I didn’t feel like. It was a very difficult period for me. I had the opportunity but I wasn’t thinking about that. And I didn’t meet any woman who was interesting enough to motivate me. The truth is that I have very high standards.

Playboy: Don’t the fans chase you?

Senna: It happens. Once in Italy a crazy woman was banging on my door. I opened it and she started to push me inside.

Playboy: And what happened?

Senna: I pushed her back to the corridor. (Laughs.) It was pretty funny.

Playboy: It never happened to you that you accpeted the offer?

Senna: It did. In 1988 after the Canadian GP an English girl asked me for a kiss. She used the word “hug” which I didn’t know. She asked: Can I have a hug? I got scared but Lisa, Ron Dennis’ wife who is American explained to me what it means. Then I said: Why not?

Playboy: Are you bothered by sex before races?

Senna: On the contrary. It’s good for me. I can face the race more relaxed.

Playboy: Did it ever happen to you that you got an aching stomach during a race?

Senna: Only before the start but then several times. During a race something far worse happened to me. I got cramped, every muscle of mine, so much that I couldn’t breath because of the pain. It was in 1984 during my second F1 race. I wasn’t prepared physically to drive for two ours in that heat, losing a lot of liquid. At the end the prospect of getting my first point made me go thorough until the finish line.

Playboy: How much weight do you lose during a race?

Senna: On average two kilos. If it’s hot, three. But you get that back very quickly if you drink enough water.

Playboy: How do you prepare yourself for the races?

Senna: Since 1984 with a physical conditioning programme. From December to March, when there aren’t races, I stay in Brazil where I run 8-10 kms five times a week on the sport track of the Sao Paulo University. When I start travelling I try to stay in a good shape. I have a regular companion from McLaren who gives me a massage and takes care of my meal during tests and trainings. I eat a lot of vegetables, carbohydrates, fish, chicken and pasta. For breakfast I usually have some kind of cornflakes and fruits. During race weekends from Thursday to Sunday I usually control my meals a lot more strictly.

Playboy: How does your pace of life change for the race weekends?

Senna. It changes in everything. My schedule determines strictly when I have to have breakfast, when I have to arrive at the track, when I have to get into the car, have lunch and go back to the car. Every step of mine is scheduled and the work is hard and continous. On the nights before races I try to go to bed early because the next morning I have to wake up between 7 and 8. These rules vary from country to country but my schedule usually doesn’t change. The aim is that I get to the track as balanced as possible.

Playboy: And what does your heart do before races?

Senna: It’s worse than most fans’ (heart)! Normally my heart beats about 60 times per minute. Before the starts it reaches 150! At the peak of the races it can even go up to 190!

Playboy: Is it because of the fear?

Senna: Because of the tension, because of the excitement of not to make a mistake during changing gears or overtaking. The fear comes when I am alone before the race. The danger of an accident is always there. I am very much afraid, not just of death but also of injury. Which is a good thing because it strengthens my life-instinct and stops me from crossing certain limits.

Playboy: Which was your most serious accident so far?

Senna: Thank God all I got thus far is a broken finger because of a silly crash in Interlagos, in 1974. Ten years later I had a more ugly accident in Hockenheim, Germany, on a very fast track. The wing of my Toleman broke off and at 280 kph I spun six times. I didn’t even have time to close my eyes. The only thing I wanted was not to get the hit from the front. I propped myself against my cockpit and I turned around to get the hit from the back. This is the best situation while crashing. A hit from the front can be deadly and it’s also dangerous to get it laterally. This was my most serious accident. But I have already had more risky situations.

Playboy: What was that like?

Senna: It happened in 1988 in Monaco, at the qualifying. I already took pole, but kept going. On every new lap I increased my advantage I was already two seconds ahead of them, which is an eternity over a race distance. I surpassed myself on every lap, I stepped into another dimension. Because of the big speed my sense of space and time changed, I suddenly saw a tunnel in front of me instead of the track. The difference between man and machine ceased to exist, I was united with the car, we became one. After five laps I felt something like a pinprick and I realized that I was in danger. I started to shake in my whole body then I returned to the pits.

Playboy: Were you very scared?

Senna: Of course. I was very scared. I still had the car under control, but I started to slip into the subconscious regions. And there I don’t know what can happen.

Playboy: Many people think that those who are driving around in circles on race tracks all their life, are a little crazy. What do you think of that?

Senna: Anybody who is not balanced enough won’t survive this job.

Playboy: Do you go to (psycho)therapy?

Senna: I have been twice, the last time at the end of 1988. I got to know many things of myself, it was very useful. If I had time I surely would continue.

Playboy: Is your life outside of the track is a race against time?

Senna: To a certain extent yes. I could do many things, for example advertising, with that I could make a lot of money. But I try to avoid these as racing consumes all of my energy. When I am in Europe I try to relax as much as possible. I go to bed early, I sleep until noon and I hardly leave my Monaco flat. I don’t even go out to have a lunch or dinner. My Portugese cleaning lady Isabel cooks very well. On late afternoons I go to jog. But I try to stay in Europe as little as possible. When I have a free week I go home to Brazil.

Playboy: And what do you do here (in Brazil)?

Senna: I try to keep away from my office where they always find some work for me (laughs). I like to be at home with my three nephews. Or I travel to Tauti, to my country house. There is a big lake there where you can jet-ski, waterski and play with remote controlled boats. There is also a kart track there where together with my five-year-old nephew Bruno we do some racing. I ride motorbikes, bicycle, I jog.

Playboy: Do you read a lot?

Senna: Very little. I don’t have the patience. That’s a big fault of mine.

Playboy: You don’t even read what they write about you?

Senna: Not really.

Playboy: And what about movies?

Senna: I like movies those are not slow.

Playboy: You like music, don’t you?

Senna: I love it. Usually I travel alone and then I always have my walkman and two casettes with me. When I arrive at the hotel I usually switch on the TV but I have little to do with these foreign programmes. I rather listen to music – any kind of music that my brother recorded for me. Of course I like Brazilian (music) the most.

Playboy: Do you go to concerts?

Senna: Not often. Mainly when I am abroad and I don’t have a company. When I’m in Brazil I rather like to stay at home.

Playboy: But you sometimes go out in Sao Paulo, don’t you?

Senna: Sometimes I go to a restaurant with my friends, sometimes even to clubs. I used to go to the Gallery (a club or a restaurant, I guess - Galko), but it was long ago.

Playboy: Has it ever happened to you that you drank more than you should have?

Senna (laughs I don’t deny it, it happened already. But I don’t drink much. I like wine and champagne. For example, after the Monaco GP I drank a bottle of wine which I haven’t done for a long time. However I can’t stand whisky and beer.

Playboy: Have you ever tried any kind of drug?

Senna: Does ether count as a drug? I have already smelled it. At first it was good, but for the second time it wasn’t so I stopped. I don’t need that. I didn’t start smoking either.

Playboy: So how does it feel like to be sponsored by Marlboro?

Senna: The name of the brand is on the car but with that I don’t force anybody to smoke. Philip Morris contributed a lot to motorsports. This company made the sport popular in the World and it made it possible for many to follow the races live. I view this side, not the negativities.

Playboy: But do you think smoking is harmful or not?

Senna: Without a doubt it’s not good for health. On the other hand there are people who stop smoking and gain weight.

Playboy: But people who never smoked don’t get into this situation. So your motto would be: “Don’t start it!”?

Senna: To be honest I would never participate in such a campaign. The reasons are obvious.

Playboy: And other campaigns? Didn’t the mayor of Sao Paulo, Luíza Erudina from the PT Party want to get your support for the nominee of the party, Lula?

Senna: That doesn’t matter. Almost every nominee wanted my support. But I am not a political type, I don’t know much about politics and I don’t even want to. I am independent and I voted for the one who wanted the best for everybody.

Playboy: Are Brazilian cars really bad wagons as President Collor claims?

Senna: No. The only problem is that they cost too much compared to European and especially Japanese cars. Also the restriction on technical import made the development of Brazilian car manufacturing harder. Now that they opened (the market) again the quality can only improve.

Playboy: What do you think the best road cars are?

Senna: I would import any Mercedes from Europe and from Japan Hondas. Toyota and GM also produces very good car. That’s what President Collor wants to introduce in Brazil as well.

Playboy: Brazilians can only hope that they will see you many times on the podium until the end of the championship. How would you react if during this time Balestre would mix you up with Jean Alesi and he would kiss you like he did to the Frenchman in Monaco?

Senna: That will never happen (laughs). Maybe once I will be able to talk about this topic more clearly. As openly as I have been talking about other matters of my life now.
亮了(0)
回复
哇哇哇。。。这么长。。。长期招工吧
哇哇哇。。。这么长。。。长期招工吧
亮了(0)
回复
Re:McLaren分版招工&招商贴
虎扑游戏中心
迈凯伦最热帖
亚洲精品一区二区三区
我迈板块,专区的图标都没有了
原来21年意大利站的1-2带回是透支了今年的运气
这换胎真实一言难尽(每站更新)
这站正赛说明了车没有问题,大牙还有适应的时间
[流言板]里卡多:我和Max做过队友,怎么可能比队友慢1秒?
[流言板]迈凯伦誓言继续2021赛车研发
[流言板]迈凯伦:诺里斯可以挑战梅赛德斯和红牛
[流言板]迈凯伦为里卡多解围:赛道夸大了差距
[流言板]诺里斯:选择软胎重新起步是正确的
迈凯伦最新帖
亚洲精品一区二区三区
原来21年意大利站的1-2带回是透支了今年的运气
我迈板块,专区的图标都没有了
这站正赛说明了车没有问题,大牙还有适应的时间
[流言板]里卡多:我和Max做过队友,怎么可能比队友慢1秒?
[流言板]迈凯伦誓言继续2021赛车研发
[流言板]迈凯伦:诺里斯可以挑战梅赛德斯和红牛
[流言板]迈凯伦为里卡多解围:赛道夸大了差距
[流言板]诺里斯:选择软胎重新起步是正确的
[流言板]诺里斯高情商自责:是我把事情搞糟了
热门游戏-即点即玩
无需下载,足球经理模式一键即玩
《NBA英雄》教练系统上线啦!我选好了,看看你的